Literature DB >> 19028362

Health economics of osteoporosis.

Fredrik Borgström1, John A Kanis.   

Abstract

Rather than reviewing the many studies of cost effectiveness in osteoporosis, this paper reviews the principles of cost-effectiveness analysis and the gaps in our knowledge that are required to improve such analyses in osteoporosis. These include more information on the cost of fractures and their consequences on health states, particularly on an international basis. New developments include the incorporation of adherence into models, the use of the FRAX tool to assess cost-effectiveness in individuals with any combination of risk factors for fracture, and the setting of intervention thresholds based on cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 19028362     DOI： 10.1016/j.beem.2008.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN： 1521-690X            Impact factor:   4.690


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention program in nursing homes.

Authors:  S Heinrich; K Rapp; N Stuhldreher; U Rissmann; C Becker; H-H König
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cost-utility of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; O Bruyère; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Cost of falls in old age: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Heinrich; K Rapp; U Rissmann; C Becker; H-H König
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Access to oral osteoporosis drugs among female Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Lin; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Jeffrey S McCullough; Lesley Weaver
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-05-14

Review 5.  Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; M Hiligsmann; V Rabenda; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Osteoporosis in the community: Sensitivity of self-reported estimates and medication use of those diagnosed with the condition.

Authors:  T K Gill; A W Taylor; C L Hill; P J Phillips
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Health technology assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickael Hiligsmann; John A Kanis; Juliet Compston; Cyrus Cooper; Bruno Flamion; Pierre Bergmann; Jean-Jacques Body; Steven Boonen; Olivier Bruyere; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures.

Authors:  Tore Christoffersen; Anne Winther; Ole Andreas Nilsen; Luai Awad Ahmed; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Guri Grimnes; Elaine Dennison; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-10

9.  Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; W Ben Sedrine; O Bruyère; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  National healthcare budget impact analysis of the treatment for osteoporosis and fractures in Korea.

Authors:  Hwabok Yi; Yong-Chan Ha; Young-Kyun Lee; Young-Taik Lim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.