Literature DB >> 19028342

Controversies in surgical management of the node-positive neck after chemoradiation.

Miriam N Lango1, Jeffrey N Myers, Adam S Garden.   

Abstract

The addition of chemotherapy to radiation in the treatment of advanced-staged head and neck cancer has improved local-regional control and increased complete clinical and pathologic response rates in the neck. However, for those patients with residual neck disease on a posttreatment computed tomography (CT) scan, there remains significant controversy as to how to further assess the neck for the presence of a viable tumor and when to perform a neck dissection. Recently, investigators from Australia have assembled level I evidence to support the use of positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning to assess treatment response and have shown a very high negative predictive value for patients with a negative PET at 12 weeks after the completion of therapy. These data support the practice of observing PET-negative necks and intervening with neck dissection in PET-positive necks. However, not all investigators, practitioners, and patients are comfortable with delaying intervention for such a long time interval after treatment. The authors favor assessment of the neck with a CT scan at 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy and recommend neck dissection for patients with radiographic residual disease at this time point. One rationale is that 6 weeks is an optimal window for operative intervention after acute treatment effects have subsided and before extensive fibrosis and scarring, which translates to less morbidity for the patient who is treated surgically. Another rationale is that those who develop regional recurrence can be hard to salvage surgically, and waiting an additional 6 weeks could allow for the expansion of resistant clones. The significance of this is unclear, however, because patients with residual disease are at a higher risk for local and distant as well as regional failure. Thus, further prospective studies of the role of postchemoradiotherapy PET scanning and neck dissection are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19028342     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of neck dissection requirement after definitive radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Juliette Thariat; K Kian Ang; Pamela K Allen; Anesa Ahamad; Michelle D Williams; Jeffrey N Myers; Adel K El-Naggar; Lawrence E Ginsberg; David I Rosenthal; Bonnie S Glisson; William H Morrison; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Long-term regional control in the observed neck following definitive chemoradiation for node-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Goenka; Luc G T Morris; Shyam S Rao; Suzanne L Wolden; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus; Nisha Ohri; Jeremy Setton; Benjamin H Lok; Nadeem Riaz; Borys R Mychalczak; Heiko Schoder; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; David G Pfister; Michael J Zelefsky; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Residual neck disease management in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy plus cetuximab.

Authors:  R Montal; M Oliva; M Taberna; L De Avila; A Rovira; M Cos; M Mañós; V Navarro; J Nogués; A Lozano; L Rodríguez; E Vilajosana; S Vázquez; R Mesia
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Persistent lymph nodes after curative chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: imaging predictors of response for decision-making.

Authors:  Alfredo Páez-Carpio; Santiago Medrano-Martorell; Joan Berenguer; Africa Muxí; Isabel Vilaseca; Izaskun Valduvieco; Paola Castillo; Neus Baste; F Xavier Avilés-Jurado; Juan José Grau; Laura Oleaga
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  Cost-effectiveness of CT and PET-CT for determining the need for adjuvant neck dissection in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  D J Sher; R B Tishler; D Annino; R S Punglia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Persistent Head and Neck Cancer Following First-Line Treatment.

Authors:  Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; Madeleine Lichtenecker; Maria Anegg; Daniel Dejaco; Barbara Kofler; Volker Hans Schartinger; Maria-Therese Kasseroler; Britta Forthuber; Andrea Posch; Herbert Riechelmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Surgical rescue for persistent head and neck cancer after first-line treatment.

Authors:  Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; L Golm; D Dejaco; D Riedl; B Kofler; C Url; D Wolfram; H Riechelmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  FDG-PET/CT in the Assessment of Treatment Response after Oncologic Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Harri Keski-Säntti; Timo Mustonen; Jukka Schildt; Kauko Saarilahti; Antti A Mäkitie
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2014-08-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.