Literature DB >> 19028284

Deformation of prostate and seminal vesicles relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers.

Gerard J van der Wielen1, Theodore F Mutanga, Luca Incrocci, Wim J Kirkels, Eliana M Vasquez Osorio, Mischa S Hoogeman, Ben J M Heijmen, Hans C J de Boer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the residual geometric uncertainties after on-line corrections with intraprostatic fiducial markers, this study analyzed the deformation of the prostate and, in particular, the seminal vesicles relative to such markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A planning computed tomography (CT) scan and three repeat CT scans were obtained for 21 prostate cancer patients who had had three to four cylindrical gold markers placed. The prostate and whole seminal vesicles (clinical target volume [CTV]) were delineated on each scan at a slice thickness of 1.5 mm. Rigid body transformations (translation and rotation) mapping the markers onto the planning scan positions were obtained. The translation only (T(only)) or both translation and rotation were applied to the delineated CTVs. Next, the residue CTV surface displacements were determined using nonrigid registration of the delineated contours. For translation and rotation of the CTV, the residues represented deformation; for T(only), the residues stemmed from deformation and rotation. T(only) represented the residues for most currently applied on-line protocols. The patient and population statistics of the CTV surface displacements were calculated. The intraobserver delineation variation was similarly quantified using repeat delineations for all patients and corrected for.
RESULTS: The largest CTV deformations were observed at the anterior and posterior side of the seminal vesicles (population average standard deviation </=3 mm). Prostate deformation was small (standard deviation </=1 mm). The increase in these deviations when neglecting rotation (T(only)) was small.
CONCLUSION: Although prostate deformation with respect to implanted fiducial markers was small, the corresponding deformation of the seminal vesicles was considerable. Adding marker-based rotational corrections to on-line translation corrections provided a limited reduction in the estimated planning margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028284     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Comparison of dose decrement from intrafraction motion for prone and supine prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Olsen; Parag J Parikh; Michael Watts; Camille E Noel; Kenneth W Baker; Lakshmi Santanam; Jeff M Michalski
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review.

Authors:  Angela G M O'Neill; Suneil Jain; Alan R Hounsell; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes.

Authors:  Maria Antico; Peter Prinsen; Francesco Cellini; Alice Fracassi; Alfonso A Isola; David Cobben; Davide Fontanarosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Qualitative evaluation of fiducial markers for radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Gil'ad N Cohen; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-16

6.  Physical and clinical implications of radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer using a full bladder protocol.

Authors:  Raffaella Cambria; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Dario Zerini; Federica Cattani; Flavia Serafini; Rosa Luraschi; Guido Pedroli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Development of a population-based model of surface segmentation uncertainties for uncertainty-weighted deformable image registrations.

Authors:  Jian Wu; Martin J Murphy; Elisabeth Weiss; William C Sleeman; Jeffrey Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The dosimetric effect of intrafraction prostate motion on step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: magnitude, correlation with motion parameters, and comparison with helical tomotherapy plans.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Bhavin Chauhan; Jeffrey V Siebers; Joseph Moore; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Forecasting longitudinal changes in oropharyngeal tumor morphology throughout the course of head and neck radiation therapy.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Arvind Rao; Lei Dong; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; Rajat J Kudchadker; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A Population-based Statistical Model for Investigating Heterogeneous Intraprostatic Sensitivity to Radiation Toxicity After 125I Seed Implantation.

Authors:  Kazuma Kobayashi; Naoya Murakami; Kana Takahashi; Koji Inaba; Hiroshi Igaki; Ryuji Hamamoto; Jun Itami
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.