Literature DB >> 19028202

Impact of changing definitions for myocardial infarction: a report from the AMIS registry.

Philip Urban1, Dragana Radovanovic, Paul Erne, Jean-Christophe Stauffer, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Stephan Windecker, Osmund Bertel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of the new definitions of myocardial infarction, we retrospectively analyzed 9190 patients from 63 hospitals with reported peak troponin values included between 2001 and 2007 in the Swiss AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) Plus registry.
METHODS: Patients were classified as belonging to the "classic" myocardial infarction group (peak total CK or CK-MB above the upper limit of normal, or troponin T [TnT] >0.1 microg/L or troponin I [TnI] >0.1-0.8 microg/L [depending on the assay]) or "new" myocardial infarction group (TnT >0.01 microg/L or TnI >0.01-0.07 microg/L).
RESULTS: There were 489 patients in the "new" group who were similar to the 8701 "classic" patients in terms of age, sex, and prevalence of both diabetes and renal failure, but more frequently had a history of prior coronary artery disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. At admission, they less frequently had ST elevation on their electrocardiogram, were more frequently in Killip class I, and received less primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Hospital mortality was 3.5% in the "new" and 6.7% in the "classic" myocardial infarction group (P=.004). In a subset of patients with a longer follow-up, mortality at 3 and 12 months was 1% and 5.6%, respectively, for "new" and 1.6% and 4%, respectively, for "classic" myocardial infarction (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with minimal elevation of serum troponin have smaller infarctions, less aggressive treatment, fewer early complications, and a better early prognosis than patients with higher serum biomarker levels. After discharge, however, their prognosis currently appears no different from that of patients with a "classic" myocardial infarction event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028202     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  Lessons learned from the design and implementation of myocardial infarction adjudication tailored for HIV clinical cohorts.

Authors:  H M Crane; S R Heckbert; D R Drozd; M J Budoff; J A C Delaney; C Rodriguez; P Paramsothy; W B Lober; G Burkholder; J H Willig; M J Mugavero; W C Mathews; P K Crane; R D Moore; S Napravnik; J J Eron; P Hunt; E Geng; P Hsue; G S Barnes; J McReynolds; I Peter; C Grunfeld; M S Saag; M M Kitahata
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Sex differences in cardiovascular health: does sexism influence women's health?

Authors:  Lisa Molix
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Association of race and sex with risk of incident acute coronary heart disease events.

Authors:  Monika M Safford; Todd M Brown; Paul M Muntner; Raegan W Durant; Stephen Glasser; Jewell H Halanych; James M Shikany; Ronald J Prineas; Tandaw Samdarshi; Vera A Bittner; Cora E Lewis; Christopher Gamboa; Mary Cushman; Virginia Howard; George Howard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Outcome of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome on palliative treatment: insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus Registry 1997-2014.

Authors:  Paul Erne; Dragana Radovanovic; Burkhardt Seifert; Osmund Bertel; Philip Urban
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Hospital laboratory reporting may be a barrier to detection of 'microsize' myocardial infarction in the US: an observational study.

Authors:  Monika M Safford; Gaurav Parmar; Codrin S Barasch; Jewell H Halanych; Stephen P Glasser; David C Goff; Ronald J Prineas; Todd M Brown
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.