Literature DB >> 19028159

Long-term outcomes of arthroscopic acromioplasty for chronic shoulder impingement syndrome: a prospective cohort study with a minimum of 12 years' follow-up.

Sten Odenbring1, Philippe Wagner, Isam Atroshi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of arthroscopic acromioplasty for shoulder impingement syndrome.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 31 shoulders (24 men) that underwent arthroscopic acromioplasty for shoulder impingement syndrome during 1992 and 1993. The mean age at surgery was 49 years (range, 33 to 68 years). A group of 29 shoulders (22 men) operated on consecutively with open acromioplasty from 1985 through 1991 served as controls. The patients were evaluated with the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score (range, 0 to 35 points) at baseline and at 2 follow-up times performed at a mean of 1 and 13 years after surgery, respectively. At the second follow-up, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the Short Form-36 bodily pain score, and the EQ-5D health utility index also were obtained.
RESULTS: After arthroscopic acromioplasty, the mean improvement in UCLA score from baseline to long-term follow-up was 13 points (95% confidence interval, 11 to 15 points), and the scores indicated an excellent or good result in 77% of shoulders. The mean UCLA score was 32 points (SD, 5 points) for the patients treated with arthroscopic acromioplasty and 28 points (SD, 8 points) for those treated with open acromioplasty; the mean difference was 4.3 points (95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 8.2 points; P = .03). In a mixed-model analysis adjusting for age, sex, duration of symptoms, preoperative UCLA score, dominance of operated side, rotator cuff status at surgery, and time since surgery, the rate of change from baseline in UCLA score over time was significantly better after arthroscopic surgery than after open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Good results of arthroscopic acromioplasty were maintained at 12 to 14 years after surgery with excellent or good results shown in 77% of shoulders, and the long-term outcomes were superior to those after open acromioplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic case-control study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028159     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.04.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression and Acromioplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2016-04-13

2.  Radiofrequency microtenotomy: a promising method for treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Authors:  Zeiad Al-Ani; Eivind Wergeland Jacobsen; Jüri-Toomas Kartus; Gunnar Knutsen; Khaled Meknas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Long-term patient satisfaction and functional outcome 8-11 years after subacromial decompression.

Authors:  Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg; Ulla Svantesson; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression].

Authors:  S Lerch; S Elki; M Jaeger; T Berndt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Karl-Åke Jansson; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Shoulder function and work disability after decompression surgery for subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy exercises and occupational medical assistance.

Authors:  Susanne W Svendsen; David H Christiansen; Jens Peder Haahr; Linda C Andrea; Poul Frost
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effect of arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery in patients with preoperative restricted range of motion.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Patrick Henry; Giuseppe Costa; Tim Dwyer; Richard Holtby
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The Use of Physiotherapy among Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: Impact of Sex, Socio-Demographic and Clinical Factors.

Authors:  David Høyrup Christiansen; Poul Frost; Lars Henrik Frich; Deborah Falla; Susanne Wulff Svendsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Shoulder Impingement.

Authors:  Bijayendra Singh; Nik Bakti; Abhinav Gulihar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Arthroscopic Fixation of Comminuted Glenoid Fractures Using Cannulated Screws and Suture Anchors.

Authors:  Feng Qu; Bangtuo Yuan; Wei Qi; Chunbao Li; Xuezhen Shen; Qi Guo; Gang Zhao; Jiangtao Wang; Hongliang Li; Xi Lu; Yujie Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.