Un Ae Han1, Yoonji Kim, Je Uk Park. 1. Department of Craniomaxillofacial surgery, Kangnam St Mary's Hospital, Medical College, the Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the displacement and stress distributions during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion under different surgical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3-dimensional finite element model of a maxilla with a Hyrax appliance was constructed and an expansion force of 6000 grams was applied using the expansion screw. According to the surgical procedures, 5 groups including a control group without surgery (Group I) were simulated. The experimental groups were as follows; Group II (Le Fort I osteotomy), Group III (Le Fort I osteotomy and paramedian osteotomy), Group IV (Le Fort I osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation), and Group V (Le Fort I osteotomy, paramedian osteotomy, and pterygomaxillary separation). RESULTS: Displacement of the maxilla gradually increased from Group 1 to Group 5 in all three planes of space, indicating that combination of the Le Fort I osteotomy with paramedian osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation produce greatest displacement of the maxilla. By surgical relief, the stress exerted on anchor teeth was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the combination of Le Fort I and paramedian osteotomy with pterygomaxillary separation is an effective procedure for increasing the expansion of the maxilla with lower side effects caused by excessive stresses around the anchor teeth.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the displacement and stress distributions during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion under different surgical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3-dimensional finite element model of a maxilla with a Hyrax appliance was constructed and an expansion force of 6000 grams was applied using the expansion screw. According to the surgical procedures, 5 groups including a control group without surgery (Group I) were simulated. The experimental groups were as follows; Group II (Le Fort I osteotomy), Group III (Le Fort I osteotomy and paramedian osteotomy), Group IV (Le Fort I osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation), and Group V (Le Fort I osteotomy, paramedian osteotomy, and pterygomaxillary separation). RESULTS: Displacement of the maxilla gradually increased from Group 1 to Group 5 in all three planes of space, indicating that combination of the Le Fort I osteotomy with paramedian osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation produce greatest displacement of the maxilla. By surgical relief, the stress exerted on anchor teeth was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the combination of Le Fort I and paramedian osteotomy with pterygomaxillary separation is an effective procedure for increasing the expansion of the maxilla with lower side effects caused by excessive stresses around the anchor teeth.
Authors: Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Dhyanisree Chembeti; Prasad Mandava; V Karunakar Reddy; Sharath Kumar Shetty; Suja Ani George Journal: J Int Oral Health Date: 2015-09