Literature DB >> 19027280

Gender differences in the prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma in athletes.

Jean-Bruno Langdeau1, Anna Day, Hélène Turcotte, Louis-Philippe Boulet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although athletes have a high prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and asthma, little is known about possible gender differences in regard to these features. We looked at the comparative prevalence of AHR, physician-diagnosed asthma and respiratory symptoms during exercise in female (F) and male (M) athletes.
METHOD: A retrospective analysis was done on 2 groups of athletes: Group 1 (n=100) taking part in a study on the prevalence of AHR to methacholine (PC(20)<16mg/ml) and Group 2 (n=698), taking part in a provincial survey on the prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma. Subjects from both groups filled the same questionnaire on respiratory symptoms during exercise (breathlessness, wheezing and chest tightness).
RESULTS: In Group 1, prevalence of AHR was significantly higher in female (60%) compared with male (21.5%, p<0.0001) athletes despite a similar prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma (F: 17.1%, M: 15.4%, p>0.05). Respiratory symptoms during exercise were more frequently reported in females (37.1%, M: 16.9%, p=0.02); however, when corrected for the PC(20), this difference became non-significant. In Group 2, the prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma was not different between genders (F: 12.5%, M: 14%, p>0.05) but respiratory symptoms during exercise were more often reported in female (19.4%) than in male (12.2%, p=0.01) athletes.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows a higher prevalence of AHR and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in female compared to male athletes, but a similar prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma. This suggested that the increase in respiratory symptoms in female athletes failed to translate into a higher prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19027280     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  8 in total

1.  Exercise-induced asthma: critical analysis of the protective role of montelukast.

Authors:  Terrence W Carver
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-10-22

2.  Responsiveness to Ipratropium Bromide in Male and Female Patients with Mild to Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Ma'en Obeidat; Guohai Zhou; Janice M Leung; Donald Tashkin; Robert Wise; John Connett; Philippe Joubert; Yohan Bossé; Maarten van den Berge; Corry-Anke Brandsma; David C Nickle; Ke Hao; Peter D Paré; Don D Sin
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Respiratory Function and Symptoms Post Cold Air Exercise in Female High and Low Ventilation Sport Athletes.

Authors:  Michael D Kennedy; Martin Faulhaber
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.764

4.  Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: The effects of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

Authors:  James P Kemp
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  High Prevalence of Exercise-induced Laryngeal Obstruction in a Cohort of Elite Cross-country Skiers.

Authors:  Tommie Irewall; Catharina Bäcklund; Leif Nordang; Marie Ryding; Nikolai Stenfors
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 6.  Asthma, atopy, and exercise: Sex differences in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  Daniel Enrique Rodriguez Bauza; Patricia Silveyra
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Are Respiratory Responses to Cold Air Exercise Different in Females Compared to Males? Implications for Exercise in Cold Air Environments.

Authors:  Michael D Kennedy; Elisabeth Lenz; Martin Niedermeier; Martin Faulhaber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Sex Differences in Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Enrique Rodriguez Bauza; Patricia Silveyra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.