Literature DB >> 19025774

Influence of patellar ligament insertion angle on quadriceps usage during walking in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects.

Choongsoo S Shin1, Ajit M Chaudhari, Chris O Dyrby, Thomas P Andriacchi.   

Abstract

Reduced quadriceps contraction has been suggested as an adaptation to prevent anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. This theory has been supported by a recent study that peak knee flexion moment (thought to be created by a decrease of quadriceps contraction) during walking was negatively correlated with patellar ligament insertion angle (PLIA) in ACL-deficient knees, but not in contralateral, uninjured knees. In addition, the PLIA was significantly smaller in ACL-deficient knees than in contralateral, uninjured knees. However, it is unknown whether ACL reconstruction restores the PLIA or whether the relationship between the PLIA and knee flexion moments previously observed in ACL-deficient knees disappears. This study tested the following hypotheses: (1) The PLIA of ACL-reconstructed knees is significantly smaller than the PLIA of uninjured contralateral knees; (2) Peak knee flexion moment (balanced by net quadriceps moment) during walking is negatively correlated with the PLIA in ACL-reconstructed knees. The PLIA of 24 ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knees were measured using MRI, and peak knee flexion moments during walking were measured. Results showed that the PLIA of ACL-reconstructed (22.9 +/- 4.4 degrees) knees was not significantly smaller (p = 0.09, power = 0.99) than the PLIA of contralateral (24.1 +/- 4.8 degrees) knees. Peak knee flexion moment was not correlated with the PLIA following ACL reconstruction (R2 = 0.016, power = 0.99). However, the magnitude of the knee flexion moment remained significantly lower in ACL-reconstructed knees. In summary, this study has shown that the PLIA of ACL-reconstructed knees returned to normal and that patients no longer adapt their gait in response to the PLIA, though quadriceps function did not return to normal levels. Copyright 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19025774     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  Return of normal gait as an outcome measurement in acl reconstructed patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  A Gokeler; A Benjaminse; C F van Eck; K E Webster; L Schot; E Otten
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

Review 2.  Progressive Changes in Walking Kinematics and Kinetics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction: A Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lindsay V Slater; Joseph M Hart; Adam R Kelly; Christopher M Kuenze
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Leveraging explainable machine learning to identify gait biomechanical parameters associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Christos Kokkotis; Serafeim Moustakidis; Themistoklis Tsatalas; Charis Ntakolia; Georgios Chalatsis; Stylianos Konstadakos; Michael E Hantes; Giannis Giakas; Dimitrios Tsaopoulos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The role of patellar tendon morphometry on anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Ozum Tuncyurek; Mine Ozkol; Ugur Ozic; Yuksel Pabuscu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Variation of Anatomical and Physiological Parameters that Affect Estimates of ACL Loading During Drop Landing.

Authors:  Thomas W Kernozek; Robert J Ragan; John D Willson; Chelsey S Koehler; Timothy R Lopez
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.