Sheina Orbell1, Maria Kyriakaki. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom. sorbell@essex.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous work on temporal framing of health communications has focused upon detection behaviors that possess an inherent immediate risk of negative consequences. The present studies evaluate the role of temporal frame for a preventive behavior, using sunscreen. DESIGN: Two experimental field studies manipulated the temporal frame in which positive and negative consequences of using sunscreen were presented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive responses, intention, and behavior (experiment 2). RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, Experiment 1 showed that individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC; A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. S. Boninger, & C. S. Edwards, 1994) moderated (a) the processing of long- versus short-term consequences and (b) the persuasive impact of the different temporal frames on behavioral intentions. In Experiment 2, the balance of positive versus negative thoughts generated by reading the persuasive communications was shown to mediate the effects of the Temporal Frame x CFC interaction on a behavioral measure. CONCLUSION: Findings extend previous work by demonstrating the importance of individual differences in CFC to the processing of health communication about a preventive health behavior and to a behavioral outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Previous work on temporal framing of health communications has focused upon detection behaviors that possess an inherent immediate risk of negative consequences. The present studies evaluate the role of temporal frame for a preventive behavior, using sunscreen. DESIGN: Two experimental field studies manipulated the temporal frame in which positive and negative consequences of using sunscreen were presented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive responses, intention, and behavior (experiment 2). RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, Experiment 1 showed that individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC; A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. S. Boninger, & C. S. Edwards, 1994) moderated (a) the processing of long- versus short-term consequences and (b) the persuasive impact of the different temporal frames on behavioral intentions. In Experiment 2, the balance of positive versus negative thoughts generated by reading the persuasive communications was shown to mediate the effects of the Temporal Frame x CFC interaction on a behavioral measure. CONCLUSION: Findings extend previous work by demonstrating the importance of individual differences in CFC to the processing of health communication about a preventive health behavior and to a behavioral outcome.
Authors: Melissa A Lewis; Dana M Litt; Kevin M King; Tracey A Garcia; Katja A Waldron; Christine M Lee Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Patricia H Strachan; Sonya de Laat; Sandra L Carroll; Lisa Schwartz; Katie Vaandering; Gurjit K Toor; Heather M Arthur Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Song Zhou; Linqian Li; Yan Zhao; Yiheng Cao; Baozhong Peng; Lei Zheng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390