Literature DB >> 19024333

Eugenics concept: from Plato to present.

C H Güvercin1, B Arda.   

Abstract

All prospective studies and purposes to improve cure and create a race that would be exempt of various diseases and disabilities are generally defined as eugenic procedures. They aim to create the "perfect" and "higher" human being by eliminating the "unhealthy" prospective persons. All of the supporting actions taken in order to enable the desired properties are called positive eugenic actions; the elimination of undesired properties are defined as negative eugenics. In addition, if such applications and approaches target the public as a whole, they are defined as macro-eugenics. On the other hand, if they only aim at individuals and/or families, they are called micro-eugenics. As generally acknowledged, Galton re-introduced eugenic proposals, but their roots stretch as far back as Plato. Eugenic thoughts and developments were widely accepted in many different countries beginning with the end of the 19th to the first half of the 20th centuries. Initially, the view of negative eugenics that included compulsory sterilizations of handicapped, diseased and "lower" classes, resulted in tens of thousands being exterminated especially in the period of Nazi Germany. In the 1930s, the type of micro positive eugenics movement found a place within the pro-natalist policies of a number of countries. However, it was unsuccessful since the policy was not able to become effective enough and totally disappeared in the 1960s. It was no longer a fashionable movement and left a deep impression on public opinion after the long years of war. However, developments in genetics and its related fields have now enabled eugenic thoughts to reappear under the spotlight and this is creating new moral dilemmas from an ethical perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19024333     DOI: 10.1558/hrge.v14i2.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Genet Ethics        ISSN: 1028-7825


  2 in total

Review 1.  The arrogance of teratology: A brief chronology of attitudes throughout history.

Authors:  John M DeSesso
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Germ line genome editing in clinics: the approaches, objectives and global society.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.