Literature DB >> 19023732

Comparing depression diagnostic symptoms across younger and older adults.

Steve Balsis1, Jeffrey A Cully.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Depression in later life has potential grave implications and contributes to heavy emotional, medical, and economic burdens. Therefore, it is not surprising that identifying depression and its symptoms in later life has remained a sustained concern for professionals who treat older patients. Despite this concern, the current diagnostic gold standard may not identify depression symptoms equally well in older and younger adults. The objective of this analysis is to determine whether older and younger adults with equivalent levels of latent depression are equally likely to endorse particular DSM diagnostic symptoms.
METHOD: We analyzed DSM depression data using Item Response Theory (IRT)-based differential item functioning analyses. The data came from 1808 older adults (age 65-98 years) and 3734 younger adults (age 18-34 years) who participated in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions.
RESULTS: The analyses confirmed our hypothesis. The DSM items identify depression differently in younger and older adults. Specifically, results showed that older adults were more likely to endorse somatic items and less likely to endorse cognitive and suicide items than their younger counterparts with equivalent levels of depression.
CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence that the DSM depression items work differently across age groups when controlling for latent depression. It is important to consider, however, that these findings are limited by the sampling methodology and the particular protocol implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19023732     DOI: 10.1080/13607860802428000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Ment Health        ISSN: 1360-7863            Impact factor:   3.658


  6 in total

Review 1.  Towards a new conceptualization of depression in older adult cancer patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebecca M Saracino; Barry Rosenfeld; Christian J Nelson
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.658

2.  Differential item functioning in the Cambridge Mental Disorders in the Elderly (CAMDEX) Depression Scale across middle age and late life.

Authors:  Ryne Estabrook; Michael E Sadler; Matt McGue
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-05-04

3.  Screening for depression in arthritis populations: an assessment of differential item functioning in three self-reported questionnaires.

Authors:  Jinxiang Hu; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Self-reported versus informant-reported depressive symptoms in adults with mild intellectual disability.

Authors:  I Mileviciute; S L Hartley
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2013-07-31

5.  Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample.

Authors:  Thomas Forkmann; Maren Boecker; Markus Wirtz; Heide Glaesmer; Elmar Brähler; Christine Norra; Siegfried Gauggel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Validation of brief screening measures for depression and anxiety in young people with substance use disorders.

Authors:  Kate H Bentley; Hitoshi Sakurai; Kelsey L Lowman; Lisa Rines-Toth; James McKowen; Paola Pedrelli; A Eden Evins; Amy M Yule
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.839

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.