Literature DB >> 1902309

Prevalence of elevated serum cholesterol in personnel of the U.S. Navy.

L K Trent1.   

Abstract

Fasting blood lipid profiles were collected for 5,487 active duty Navy men and women presenting for routine physical examinations. Mean serum cholesterol for the sample (mean age 33.6 years) was 208.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg per dL). Cholesterol level increased with age, decreased with education, and was higher in men than in women. Using the Navy's own risk cutpoints for total cholesterol (200 mg per dL for ages 18-24, 220 mg per dL for ages 25 and older), 36.9 percent of the sample were found to be at risk. When the percentage of the population at risk was computed using the guidelines suggested by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference, rather than the Navy's cutpoints, results were almost identical (36.3 percent at risk); when based on the National Cholesterol Education Program's recommended cutpoints, the percent at risk was considerably higher (55.4 percent). Risk estimates that included LDL- or HDL-cholesterol risk levels (or both) also were higher. A larger percentage of Navy personnel were at risk because of total cholesterol than were persons in an age-adjusted national sample. However, because routine examinations generally are not given until first reenlistment, the Navy sample underrepresented younger service members, and results may overestimate the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the Navy at large. The author draws attention to the problem of lack of standardization in cholesterol testing and notes that the Navy does not yet participate in an external quality control program. The difficulty in setting appropriate risk cutpoints, given the complexity of factors that must be considered as well as the general unreliability of cholesterol tests, is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1902309      PMCID: PMC1580229     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  14 in total

1.  The method of determination must be considered in interpreting blood cholesterol levels.

Authors:  D W Blank; J M Hoeg; M H Kroll; M E Ruddel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cardiac risk classification based on lipid screening.

Authors:  R Belsey; D M Baer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Bias between enzymatic methods and the reference method for cholesterol.

Authors:  M H Kroll; H Lindsey; J Greene; C Sliva; A Hainline; R J Elin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Incidence of hypercholesterolemia in the active duty Navy population in 1986.

Authors:  T P Blair; P D Marghella; R Landers; S Boccuzzi
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The prevalence of high blood cholesterol levels among adults in the United States.

Authors:  C Sempos; R Fulwood; C Haines; M Carroll; R Anda; D F Williamson; P Remington; J Cleeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparisons of referral criteria for public screening of blood cholesterol levels.

Authors:  R G Wones; K M Kerman; D C Hissa; N Meloy; E A Stein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Testing cholesterol accuracy. Performance of several common laboratory instruments.

Authors:  D D Koch; D J Hassemer; D A Wiebe; R H Laessig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Is relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356,222 primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT).

Authors:  J Stamler; D Wentworth; J D Neaton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  W P Castelli; R J Garrison; P W Wilson; R D Abbott; S Kalousdian; W B Kannel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  How reliably can compact chemistry analyzers measure lipids?

Authors:  H W Kaufman; J R McNamara; K M Anderson; P W Wilson; E J Schaefer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.