Literature DB >> 19022553

Impact of prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries on obstetric and early postnatal management.

M J Raboisson1, C Samson, C Ducreux, R C Rudigoz, P Gaucherand, P Bouvagnet, A Bozio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A growing percentage of cases of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) are being diagnosed prenatally. A decrease in the percentage of spontaneous deliveries has been reported, but the rate of cesarean section (c-section) in this population has never been studied. Our goal was to determine whether prenatal diagnosis affects delivery and immediate neonatal management of TGA neonates. STUDY
DESIGN: A series of 121 TGA arterial switch candidates were included over a 6-year period. Variables on delivery, clinical status at ICU admission, arrival time and atrial septostomy were recorded retrospectively. Comparisons between the two groups were made by Student's t or Chi-squared test.
RESULTS: A cohort of 121 patients was enrolled (48 prenatal and 73 postnatal diagnoses). Induced delivery and c-section were more frequent in the prenatal (54.1% and 31%) than in the postnatal diagnosis group (19.4% and 8%; p<0.0002 and p<0.001, respectively). The mean interval between birth and ICU admission was 2h 30 min in the prenatal compared to 26 h in the postnatal diagnosis group (p<0.001). Arrival times were similar in both groups. Atrial septostomy by umbilical route was more often feasible in the prenatal (81%) than in the postnatal diagnosis group (51%; p<0.001), with a higher rate of failure in the latter.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal awareness of TGA was associated with a higher percentage of induced deliveries and a major increase in the rate of c-section, without any impact on the newborn except easier umbilical atrial septostomy and earlier ICU admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal Counseling of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Caroline K Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Efficacy of prenatal diagnosis of major congenital heart disease on perinatal management and perioperative mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Fei Li; Kai-Yu Zhou; Jie Fang; Chuan Wang; Yi-Min Hua; De-Zhi Mu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 3.  Fetal cardiology: changing the definition of critical heart disease in the newborn.

Authors:  M Słodki; M Respondek-Liberska; J D Pruetz; M T Donofrio
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Costs, mortality, and hospital usage in relation to prenatal diagnosis in d-transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Nelangi M Pinto; Richard Nelson; Lorenzo Botto; Michael D Puchalski; Sergey Krikov; Jaewhan Kim; Norman J Waitzman
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Dextro-transposition of great vessels: difficult to detect prenatally, one of the most dangerous and one of the best prognosed.

Authors:  Maciej Słodki
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-06

6.  Prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries over a 20-year period: improved but imperfect.

Authors:  M C Escobar-Diaz; L R Freud; A Bueno; D W Brown; K G Friedman; D Schidlow; S Emani; P J Del Nido; W Tworetzky
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  The significance of an integrated management mode of prenatal diagnosis-postnatal treatment for critical congenital heart disease in newborns.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Shaoru He; Yumei Liu; Jing Zhong; Yunxia Sun; Manli Zheng; Juan Gui; Ruixi Wang; Bowen Feng; Jianling Mo; Minqiao Jian; Caisheng Liu; Yijing Liang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

8.  Performance of different scan protocols of fetal echocardiography in the diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifei Li; Yimin Hua; Jie Fang; Chuan Wang; Lina Qiao; Chaomin Wan; Dezhi Mu; Kaiyu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.