Literature DB >> 1902253

A double-blind comparison of low-dose intravenous ketamine and methohexital in adults.

K C Blankstein1, J A Anderson.   

Abstract

Two ultralight general anesthetic techniques, one using low-dose ketamine and the other using methohexital as the primary anesthetic agent, were compared for efficacy, safety, and psychomotor recovery in a double-blind fashion for use during third molar surgery. Low-dose intravenous ketamine as the primary anesthetic following premedication with fentanyl and midazolam, and in conjunction with nitrous oxide, appeared to produce less hypoxia, hypercarbia, and apnea than when methohexital was used. No significant differences were noted in heart rate or blood pressure between the techniques. The ketamine technique was universally preferred by the surgeons and anesthesiologists because of superior patient cooperation and airway management. No unpleasant psychomimetic side effects of significance were noted with the use of ketamine. Postoperative recovery took slightly longer in the ketamine group, with patients being judged fit for discharge approximately 10 to 15 minutes later than the patients who received methohexital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1902253     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90169-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of recovery of propofol and methohexital sedation using an infusion pump.

Authors:  M Cohen; S Eisig; R A Kraut
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

2.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Dental anesthesia and pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  J A Giovannitti
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1995

4.  A double blind randomized comparison of oral trimeprazine-methadone and ketamine-midazolam for sedation of pediatric dental patients for oral surgical procedures.

Authors:  J A Roelofse; L R Louw; P G Roelofse
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1998
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.