Literature DB >> 19022270

Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.

Antonino Vallesi1, Donald T Stuss, Anthony R McIntosh, Terence W Picton.   

Abstract

Ignoring irrelevant information becomes more difficult with increasing age. The present cross-sectional study addressed this issue by investigating age-related differences in the ability to withhold a response to non-target stimuli. Fourteen young (20-34 years) and 14 elderly (60-80 years) participants performed two go/nogo tasks (simple vs. complex). In the simple task the subjects responded to red O and blue X (target go stimuli) while withholding responses to the blue O and red X (conflict nogo stimuli) and to numbers of either color (irrelevant nogo stimuli). In the complex version, 4 vowels and 4 consonants were used instead of O and X. Accuracy, response times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Both young and elderly groups made more commission errors to conflict nogo stimuli (mean 5% and 8% in the simple and complex tasks, respectively, age differences not significant) than to irrelevant nogo stimuli (mean<1%), indicating difficulty in withholding a response when a pertinent stimulus feature (letter identity) was shared with the go stimuli. In addition to later RTs to go stimuli and later P3 waves for the conflicting stimuli than the young group, elderly participants showed a very prominent left posterior P2 and a large pre-central P3 to the irrelevant nogo stimuli. These findings suggest that elderly have difficulty in ignoring irrelevant nogo stimuli even when they are easily distinguishable from the go stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022270     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  26 in total

1.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Age-related differences in transfer costs: evidence from go/nogo tasks.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Lynn Hasher; Donald T Stuss
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

3.  Differential effects of age and executive functions on the resolution of the contingent negative variation: a reexamination of the frontal aging theory.

Authors:  Georg Dirnberger; Wilfried Lang; Gerald Lindinger
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-03-13

4.  Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: Distraction and disinhibition.

Authors:  Shulan Hsieh; Mengyao Wu; Chien-Hui Tang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Delia Pigat; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-19

7.  Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.

Authors:  Raksha A Mudar; Hsueh-Sheng Chiang; Mandy J Maguire; Jeffrey S Spence; Justin Eroh; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  C145 as a short-latency electrophysiological index of cognitive compensation in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Anton P Porsteinsson; Margaret N Gardner; Mark Mapstone; John W McCrary; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Elizabeth DeGrush; Lindsey A Reilly
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Age-related decline in differentiated neural responses to rare target versus frequent standard stimuli.

Authors:  Katherine K Mott; Brittany R Alperin; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.