Literature DB >> 19022121

The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery.

Francesco Sortino1, Eugenio Pedullà, Veronica Masoli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was the comparison of postoperative outcome in mandibular impacted third molars treated by piezoelectric surgery or by rotatory osteotomy technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with impacted mandibular third molars were included in the study. Fifty patients were treated by rotatory osteotomy technique (group A) and 50 patients were treated by piezoelectric osteotomy technique (group B). Therapeutic protocol was the same for both groups. Twenty-four hours after surgery, 2 different parameters, facial swelling and trismus, were evaluated in both groups. A pair of compasses were used for the evaluation of facial swelling and trismus was evaluated.
RESULTS: The average surgery time was 17 minutes in group A, 23 minutes in group B; the mean facial swelling was 7.04 mm in group A, 4.22 mm in group B; trismus was 16.76 mm in group A, 12.52 mm in group B. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction (P < .05) of postoperative facial swelling and trismus in group B; however, in this group, a statistically significant increased (P < .05 vs group A) surgery time was required.
CONCLUSION: The piezoelectric osteotomy technique produced a reduced amount of facial swelling and trismus 24 hours after surgery, but a longer surgery time was required when compared with the rotatory osteotomy technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022121     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  25 in total

1.  Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes.

Authors:  Bruno G Duarte; Diogo Assis; Paulo Ribeiro-Júnior; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Rotary Instrument or Piezoelectric for the Removal of Third Molars: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rafael Alvim Magesty; Endi Lanza Galvão; Carolina de Castro Martins; Cássio Roberto Rocha Dos Santos; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-07-09

3.  Piezosurgery for osteotomies in orbital surgery: Our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Maurizio Iacoangeli; Piergiorgio Neri; Paolo Balercia; Ettore Lupi; Alessandro Di Rienzo; Niccolò Nocchi; Lorenzo Alvaro; Massimo Scerrati
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-17

4.  Grading of Extraction and Its Relationship with Post-operative Pain and Trismus, along with Proposed Grading for Trismus.

Authors:  Sachin Pathak; Shirin Vashisth; Saurabh Mishra; Surendra Pratap Singh; Shalini Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

5.  Characterisation of bone following ultrasonic cutting.

Authors:  Sunil Claire; Simon C Lea; A Damien Walmsley
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of the C-Reactive Protein Level and Visual Analog Scale Scores between Piezosurgery and Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction.

Authors:  Lakshmi Shetty; Khushal Gangwani; Uday Londhe; Swati Bharadwaj; Mohammed Mousa H Bakri; Ahmed Alamoudi; Rodolfo Reda; Shilpa Bhandi; A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

7.  "Piezosurgery vs bur in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: Evaluation of postoperative sequelae".

Authors:  Chirag Patil; Anendd Jadhav; Rajanikanth K; Nitin Bhola; Rajiv M Borle; Apoorva Mishra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-06-12

8.  Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar.

Authors:  Francesco Sortino; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-10

9.  Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Edmund Bailey; Wafa Kashbour; Neha Shah; Helen V Worthington; Tara F Renton; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-26

Review 10.  Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qian Jiang; Yating Qiu; Chi Yang; Jingyun Yang; Minjie Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.