OBJECTIVE: To develop the Crow's Feet Grading Scale for objective quantification of the severity of lateral canthal lines and to establish the reliability of this photonumeric scale for clinical research and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-point photonumeric rating scale was developed to objectively quantify the severity of lateral canthal lines at rest and at maximum contracture of the orbicularis oculi. Nine experts rated photographs of 35 subjects, twice, with regard to the aspect crow's feet in comparison with morphed images. Inter- and intrarater variability was assessed by computing intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The agreement between the experts was significantly high. Furthermore, the test-retest correlation coefficients were high for each expert after an overnight interval, demonstrating low inter- and intraevaluator variability. CONCLUSION: The 5-point photonumeric scale generated spans the severity of the type of crow's feet for which patients most commonly seek correction. The scale is well stratified for consistent rating.
OBJECTIVE: To develop the Crow's Feet Grading Scale for objective quantification of the severity of lateral canthal lines and to establish the reliability of this photonumeric scale for clinical research and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-point photonumeric rating scale was developed to objectively quantify the severity of lateral canthal lines at rest and at maximum contracture of the orbicularis oculi. Nine experts rated photographs of 35 subjects, twice, with regard to the aspect crow's feet in comparison with morphed images. Inter- and intrarater variability was assessed by computing intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The agreement between the experts was significantly high. Furthermore, the test-retest correlation coefficients were high for each expert after an overnight interval, demonstrating low inter- and intraevaluator variability. CONCLUSION: The 5-point photonumeric scale generated spans the severity of the type of crow's feet for which patients most commonly seek correction. The scale is well stratified for consistent rating.
Authors: Greg J Goodman; Michael B Halstead; John D Rogers; Daniela Borzillo; Elizabeth Ryan; Nick Riley; John Wlodarczyk Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Date: 2012-01-18
Authors: M Suppa; F Elliott; J S Mikeljevic; Y Mukasa; M Chan; S Leake; B Karpavicius; S Haynes; E Bakker; K Peris; J H Barrett; D T Bishop; J A Newton Bishop Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Hema Sundaram; Massimo Signorini; Steven Liew; Ada R Trindade de Almeida; Yan Wu; André Vieira Braz; Steven Fagien; Greg J Goodman; Gary Monheit; Hervé Raspaldo Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Cristina Pires Camargo; Jun Xia; Caroline S Costa; Rolf Gemperli; Maria Dc Tatini; Max K Bulsara; Rachel Riera Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-05
Authors: Andreas Nikolis; Steven Bernstein; Brian Kinney; Nicolo Scuderi; Shipra Rastogi; John S Sampalis Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Date: 2016-05-13
Authors: Jean Carruthers; Lisa Donofrio; Bhushan Hardas; Diane K Murphy; Derek Jones; Alastair Carruthers; Jonathan M Sykes; Lela Creutz; Ann Marx; Sara Dill Journal: Dermatol Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.398