Literature DB >> 19021612

The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'.

Christopher G Eden1, Mischel G Neill, Mark W Louie-Johnsun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the initial experience of one surgeon, with contemporary experience of both open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and reconstructive laparoscopy, in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in 1000 patients, and to investigate the rate of change of various outcome variables for this procedure with time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2000 and December 2007, 1000 consecutive patients with clinical stage T < or = 3aN0M0 prostate cancer underwent LRP, either supervised (17%) or performed (83%), by one surgeon. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 7.0 (1-50) ng/mL and median Gleason sum 6 (4-10); the clinical stage was T1 in 46.9%, T2 in 49.8% and T3 in 3.3%.
RESULTS: The median (range) operative duration was 177 (78-600) min. There was one conversion (patient 8) to open surgery. The median blood loss was 200 (10-1300) mL and four patients were transfused (0.4%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (3-28) nights. The median catheterization time was 10.0 (0.8-120) days. There were 48 complications (4.8%) requiring surgical intervention in 33 (3.3%) patients, 58% of these as a day-case admission. The positive margin rates according to d'Amico risk groups were: low, 9.1%; intermediate, 20.3%; and high, 36.8%. The overall positive margin rate was 13.3%. The PSA level was < or =0.1 mg/L at 3 months in 99.1% of patients. At a mean follow-up of 27.7 (3-72) months, 96.1% of patients were free of biochemical recurrence. In patients with a follow-up of > or =24 months potency rates peaked in the series at 86% for all men and 94% for men aged < or =65 years, and continence rates at 98% before declining thereafter in men with a shorter follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The learning curve for operating time and blood loss was overcome within the first 100-150 cases, but complication and continence rates took 150-200 cases to reach a plateau. The longest learning curve was for potency, which did not stabilize until 700 cases. These learning curves are likely to be considerably shorter when surgeons are taught in departments with a high throughput of cases but both surgeons and patients should be aware of them. In view of these findings, the authors recommend that LRP should not be self-taught and should be learned within an immersion teaching programme. Even then, a large surgical volume is likely to be needed to maintain clinical outcomes at the highest level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19021612     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08169.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D W Good; G D Stewart; J U Stolzenburg; S A McNeill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  Adam Jones; Krishna Sethia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A comparison of early learning curves for complex bimanual coordination with open, laparoscopic, and flexible endoscopic instrumentation.

Authors:  Georg O Spaun; Bin Zheng; Daniel V Martinec; Brittany N Arnold; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic surgery of the pancreas.

Authors:  Daniel Joyce; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Gavin A Falk; Kevin El-Hayek; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Caroline Savage; Claude Abbou; Alexandre de La Taille; Laurent Salomon; Jens Rassweiler; Marcel Hruza; François Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau; Gunther Janetschek; Faissal Nassar; Ingolf Turk; Alex J Vanni; Inderbir S Gill; Philippe Koenig; Jihad H Kaouk; Luis Martinez Pineiro; Vito Pansadoro; Paolo Emiliozzi; Anders Bjartell; Thomas Jiborn; Christopher Eden; Andrew J Richards; Roland Van Velthoven; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich; Adam W Levinson; Karim A Touijer; Andrew Vickers; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tao Zheng; Xu Zhang; Xin Ma; Hong-Zhao Li; Jiang-Pin Gao; Wei Cai; Guang-Fu Chen; Jun Dong; Bao-Jun Wang; Tao-Ping Shi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  The influence of previous robotic experience in the initial learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  José Anastácio Dias; Marcos F Dall'oglio; João Roberto Colombo; Rafael F Coelho; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Effect of training and individual operator's expertise on prostate cancer detection through prostate biopsy: Implications for the current quantitative training evaluation system.

Authors:  Dongu Lee; Byung Ha Chung; Kwang Suk Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-08-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.