John L Gore1, Mark S Litwin. 1. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jgore@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Quality-of-care indicators have not yet been defined for patients with bladder cancer. Nonetheless, certain aspects of bladder cancer care can be evaluated to quantify the quality of care delivered. We sought to determine trends in continent urinary diversion to evaluate the adoption of this more optimal reconstruction. METHODS: Subjects who underwent radical cystectomy for a primary diagnosis of bladder cancer were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified covariates independently associated with utilization of continent urinary diversion after radical cystectomy using multivariate logistic regression modeling. We then examined trends in diversion type based on patient and hospital characteristics and examined the impact of hospital volume on use of continent reconstruction. RESULTS: Our weighted sample included 5,075 subjects (14.3%) who underwent continent urinary diversion and 30,295 subjects (85.7%) who underwent an ileal conduit. Independent correlates of continent diversion included younger age, male gender, having private insurance, and undergoing surgery at an urban teaching hospital. Hospitals performing continent diversions on more than 40% of their cystectomies had a yearly cystectomy volume of 0.8 surgeries. Subjects treated at high-volume hospitals trended toward lower rates of comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified substantial disparities in continent diversion which, based on yearly trends, are unlikely to improve in the near future. Continent reconstructions are not the exclusive domain of high-volume cystectomy centers. Yet efforts to increase rates of this complex reconstruction must concentrate on technique dissemination and better definition of the quality-of-life detriments incurred by cystectomy patients.
OBJECTIVE: Quality-of-care indicators have not yet been defined for patients with bladder cancer. Nonetheless, certain aspects of bladder cancer care can be evaluated to quantify the quality of care delivered. We sought to determine trends in continent urinary diversion to evaluate the adoption of this more optimal reconstruction. METHODS: Subjects who underwent radical cystectomy for a primary diagnosis of bladder cancer were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified covariates independently associated with utilization of continent urinary diversion after radical cystectomy using multivariate logistic regression modeling. We then examined trends in diversion type based on patient and hospital characteristics and examined the impact of hospital volume on use of continent reconstruction. RESULTS: Our weighted sample included 5,075 subjects (14.3%) who underwent continent urinary diversion and 30,295 subjects (85.7%) who underwent an ileal conduit. Independent correlates of continent diversion included younger age, male gender, having private insurance, and undergoing surgery at an urban teaching hospital. Hospitals performing continent diversions on more than 40% of their cystectomies had a yearly cystectomy volume of 0.8 surgeries. Subjects treated at high-volume hospitals trended toward lower rates of comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified substantial disparities in continent diversion which, based on yearly trends, are unlikely to improve in the near future. Continent reconstructions are not the exclusive domain of high-volume cystectomy centers. Yet efforts to increase rates of this complex reconstruction must concentrate on technique dissemination and better definition of the quality-of-life detriments incurred by cystectomy patients.
Authors: Sajal C Dutta; Sam C Chang; Christopher S Coffey; Joseph A Smith; Gregory Jack; Michael S Cookson Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Peter E Clark; John P Stein; Susan G Groshen; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Gary Lieskovsky; Donald G Skinner Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; S Machele Donat; Joaquim Bellmunt; Randall E Millikan; Walter Stadler; Pieter De Mulder; Amir Sherif; Hans von der Maase; Taiji Tsukamoto; Mark S Soloway Journal: Urology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Kinan Bachour; Izak Faiena; Amirali Salmasi; Andrew T Lenis; David C Johnson; Aydin Pooli; Alexandra Drakaki; Allan J Pantuck; Karim Chamie Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: John L Gore; Hua-Yin Yu; Claude Setodji; Jan M Hanley; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860