Literature DB >> 19020620

Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth.

Webb Miller1, Daniela I Drautz, Aakrosh Ratan, Barbara Pusey, Ji Qi, Arthur M Lesk, Lynn P Tomsho, Michael D Packard, Fangqing Zhao, Andrei Sher, Alexei Tikhonov, Brian Raney, Nick Patterson, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Eric S Lander, James R Knight, Gerard P Irzyk, Karin M Fredrikson, Timothy T Harkins, Sharon Sheridan, Tom Pringle, Stephan C Schuster.   

Abstract

In 1994, two independent groups extracted DNA from several Pleistocene epoch mammoths and noted differences among individual specimens. Subsequently, DNA sequences have been published for a number of extinct species. However, such ancient DNA is often fragmented and damaged, and studies to date have typically focused on short mitochondrial sequences, never yielding more than a fraction of a per cent of any nuclear genome. Here we describe 4.17 billion bases (Gb) of sequence from several mammoth specimens, 3.3 billion (80%) of which are from the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) genome and thus comprise an extensive set of genome-wide sequence from an extinct species. Our data support earlier reports that elephantid genomes exceed 4 Gb. The estimated divergence rate between mammoth and African elephant is half of that between human and chimpanzee. The observed number of nucleotide differences between two particular mammoths was approximately one-eighth of that between one of them and the African elephant, corresponding to a separation between the mammoths of 1.5-2.0 Myr. The estimated probability that orthologous elephant and mammoth amino acids differ is 0.002, corresponding to about one residue per protein. Differences were discovered between mammoth and African elephant in amino-acid positions that are otherwise invariant over several billion years of combined mammalian evolution. This study shows that nuclear genome sequencing of extinct species can reveal population differences not evident from the fossil record, and perhaps even discover genetic factors that affect extinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020620     DOI: 10.1038/nature07446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  99 in total

1.  Comparative metatranscriptomics identifies molecular bases for the physiological responses of phytoplankton to varying iron availability.

Authors:  Adrian Marchetti; David M Schruth; Colleen A Durkin; Micaela S Parker; Robin B Kodner; Chris T Berthiaume; Rhonda Morales; Andrew E Allen; E Virginia Armbrust
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Beyond the palaeomicrobiology.

Authors:  Helena Seth-Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  What Next? The Next Transit from Biology to Diagnostics: Next Generation Sequencing for Immunogenetics.

Authors:  Christian Gabriel; Stephanie Stabentheiner; Martin Danzer; Johannes Pröll
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Human evolution: stranger from Siberia.

Authors:  Terence A Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  History in a single hair.

Authors:  Howard Wolinsky
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms.

Authors:  R Ekblom; J Galindo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Ancient DNA: Towards a million-year-old genome.

Authors:  Craig D Millar; David M Lambert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Complete genomes reveal signatures of demographic and genetic declines in the woolly mammoth.

Authors:  Eleftheria Palkopoulou; Swapan Mallick; Pontus Skoglund; Jacob Enk; Nadin Rohland; Heng Li; Ayça Omrak; Sergey Vartanyan; Hendrik Poinar; Anders Götherström; David Reich; Love Dalén
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Ancient population genomics and the study of evolution.

Authors:  M Parks; S Subramanian; C Baroni; M C Salvatore; G Zhang; C D Millar; D M Lambert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Reading between the LINEs to see into the past.

Authors:  David A Ray; Roy N Platt; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.