Literature DB >> 19020427

Thirty years of research on diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds for the self-measured blood pressure at home.

Jan A Staessen1, Lutgarde Thijs, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Masahiro Kikuya, Tom Richart, José Boggia, Ahmet Adiyaman, Dirk G Dechering, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Theo Thien, Peter de Leeuw, Yutuka Imai, Eoin O'brien, Gianfranco Parati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review study is to summarize 30 years of research on cut-off limits for the self-measured blood pressure.
METHODS: We reviewed two meta-analyses, several prospective outcome studies in populations and hypertensive patients, studies in pregnant women, three clinical trials and the thresholds proposed in earlier and current hypertension guidelines.
RESULTS: In line with existing guidelines, prospective studies support that levels of the self-measured blood pressure at home of greater than or equal to 135 mmHg systolic or greater than or equal to 85 mmHg diastolic indicate hypertension. Circumstantial data suggest that levels of the self-measured blood pressure below 120/80 and 130/85 mmHg are optimal and normal, respectively. Therapeutic targets of the self-measured blood pressure to be attained on antihypertensive drug treatment are currently unknown, but should logically be lower (<135/85 mmHg) than those used to diagnose hypertension. Currently, there is no proof that therapeutic thresholds for the home blood pressure should be lower in high-risk compared with normal-risk patients. A large body of evidence, however, demonstrated that each millimetre of mercury of blood pressure lowering counts in the prevention of cardiovascular complications and that in high-risk patients even small decreases in blood pressure result in large absolute benefit.
CONCLUSION: The thresholds to diagnose hypertension from self-measured blood pressure readings at home remain unaltered since the 2000 consensus conference, but are currently supported by outcome data. Further studies need to establish what values of the self-measured blood pressure are optimal and normal in terms of cardiovascular outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020427     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283108f93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Rationale for Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Thresholds in the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Kenneth Jamerson; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Cardiovascular risk stratification and blood pressure variability on ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  José Boggia; Kei Asayama; Yan Li; Tine Willum Hansen; Luis Mena; Rudolph Schutte
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Out-of-office blood pressure improves risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension people.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Jana Brguljan-Hitij; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Preventing misdiagnosis of ambulatory hypertension: algorithm using office and home blood pressures.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Sujith Kuruvilla; Donald Haas; Thomas G Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz; William Gerin
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Determinants of the Morning-Evening Home Blood Pressure Difference in Treated Hypertensives: The HIBA-Home Study.

Authors:  Lucas S Aparicio; Jessica Barochiner; Paula E Cuffaro; José Alfie; Marcelo A Rada; Margarita S Morales; Carlos R Galarza; Marcos J Marín; Gabriel D Waisman
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 7.  Renal denervation: ultima ratio or standard in treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Alexandre Persu; Jean Renkin; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Ambulatory or home measurement of blood pressure?

Authors:  Philippe Gosse; Paul Coulon
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Outcome-driven thresholds for home blood pressure measurement: international database of home blood pressure in relation to cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  Teemu J Niiranen; Kei Asayama; Lutgarde Thijs; Jouni K Johansson; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; José Boggia; Atsushi Hozawa; Edgardo Sandoya; George S Stergiou; Ichiro Tsuji; Antti M Jula; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Risk stratification by self-measured home blood pressure across categories of conventional blood pressure: a participant-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Lutgarde Thijs; Jana Brguljan-Hitij; Teemu J Niiranen; Atsushi Hozawa; José Boggia; Lucas S Aparicio; Azusa Hara; Jouni K Johansson; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Christophe Tzourio; George S Stergiou; Edgardo Sandoya; Ichiro Tsuji; Antti M Jula; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.