Literature DB >> 19020426

Validation of the AM5600 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents.

Deborah P Jones1, Phyllis A Richey, Bruce S Alpert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We measured ambulatory blood pressure using the AM5600 in children and adolescents participating in a research study to assess the relationship of blood pressure to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Although the use of this monitor has been previously reported in adults, it has not been validated in pediatric patients. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In this study, we assess the accuracy of the monitor as compared with the mercury sphygmomanometer in children of 7-18 years of age.
RESULTS: We found that the mean of the difference between the monitor and the mercury device was 0.29+/-3.5 and 0.045+/-3.7 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which fulfills the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standard for use of a device. The cumulative percentage of readings between the two devices which differed by 5, 10 and 15 mmHg or more assigned a grade of A grade to the device according to the British Hypertension Society.
CONCLUSION: The AM5600 ambulatory blood pressure device is valid for measurement of blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020426      PMCID: PMC2754039          DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283102cfe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  4 in total

1.  Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  E O'Brien; B Waeber; G Parati; J Staessen; M G Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

2.  The AM5600 ambulatory blood pressure recording system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure and increased left ventricular mass in children at risk for hypertension.

Authors:  Phyllis A Richey; Thomas G Disessa; Margaret C Hastings; Grant W Somes; Bruce S Alpert; Deborah P Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  CDC growth charts: United States.

Authors:  R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2000-06-08
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of mercury sphygmomanometry blood pressure readings with oscillometric and central blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in youth.

Authors:  Elaine M Urbina; Philip R Khoury; Connie E McCoy; Stephen R Daniels; Lawrence M Dolan; Thomas R Kimball
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Left ventricular geometry in children and adolescents with primary hypertension.

Authors:  Phyllis A Richey; Thomas G Disessa; Grant W Somes; Bruce S Alpert; Deborah P Jones
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure reference standards in children evaluated for hypertension.

Authors:  Deborah P Jones; Phyllis A Richey; Bruce S Alpert
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Update: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Joseph T Flynn; Stephen R Daniels; Laura L Hayman; David M Maahs; Brian W McCrindle; Mark Mitsnefes; Justin P Zachariah; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Accuracy of the Spacelabs 90217 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Karen M Redwine; Laura P James; MaryAnn O'Riordan; Janice E Sullivan; Jeffrey L Blumer
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Blood aldosterone-to-renin ratio, ambulatory blood pressure, and left ventricular mass in children.

Authors:  Rongling Li; Phyllis A Richey; Thomas G DiSessa; Bruce S Alpert; Deborah P Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  Pediatric ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: indications and interpretations.

Authors:  Joseph T Flynn; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.