Literature DB >> 19020139

The extended Mallampati score and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus are predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese.

George A Mashour1, Sachin Kheterpal, Vishnu Vanaharam, Amy Shanks, Luke Y-J Wang, Warren S Sandberg, Kevin K Tremper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The modified Mallampati (MMP) classification is a standard method of oropharyngeal evaluation for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Previous studies have demonstrated that the predictive value of the MMP is improved when the patient's craniocervical junction is extended rather than neutral (Extended Mallampati Score, EMS). In the present study, we compared the predictive value of the MMP and EMS in the morbidly obese.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of adult patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > or = 40 over a 12-mo period comparing the MMP and EMS. The performance of the MMP, EMS, and other commonly used tests was compared for the ability to predict difficult laryngoscopy, defined as a Cormack-Lehane grade of 3 or 4. Positioning and direct laryngoscopic techniques were not standardized. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation was compared in patients with BMI > or = or < 40.
RESULTS: Three-hundred-forty-six patients with a BMI > or = 40 were evaluated with both the MMP and EMS and received direct laryngoscopy. On average, craniocervical extension decreased the MMP class (P < 0.0001). Compared to the MMP, the EMS improved specificity and predictive value while maintaining sensitivity. Compared to the MMP and other tests, an EMS class of 3 or 4 and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were the only statistically significant predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese. There was no difference in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation in the morbidly obese compared to patients with a BMI < 40.
CONCLUSIONS: The EMS was superior to the MMP in the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese population. A diagnosis of diabetes mellitus also warrants further investigation as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in this population. Finally, this study supports previous findings that morbid obesity is not itself a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020139     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818a9946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  17 in total

Review 1.  Anesthetic considerations in diabetic patients. Part I: preoperative considerations of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yuji Kadoi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.078

2. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

3.  Cross Sectional Observational Study Performed to See for Relation of Mallampati Score and Extended Mallampati Score with Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Sasha Maria Menon; Shailaja Sampangiramaiah; Megha Mathew
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 4.  GlideScope video laryngoscopy use tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a series of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  Vahap Saricicek; Ayse Mizrak; Rauf Gul; Sitki Goksu; Mehmet Cesur
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome and Anesthesia.

Authors:  Edmond H L Chau; Babak Mokhlesi; Frances Chung
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2012-12-14

6.  Hyomental distance in the different head positions and hyomental distance ratio in predicting difficult intubation.

Authors:  Nevena Kalezić; Mirko Lakićević; Biljana Miličić; Marina Stojanović; Vera Sabljak; Dejan Marković
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 7.  [Aspects of perioperative care in patients with diabetes].

Authors:  G Pestel; D Closhen; A Zimmermann; C Werner; M M Weber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  The effect of body mass index on intubation success rates and complications during emergency airway management.

Authors:  James M Dargin; Lillian L Emlet; Frank X Guyette
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; George Kovacs; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.

Authors:  Dominik Roth; Nathan L Pace; Anna Lee; Karen Hovhannisyan; Alexandra-Maria Warenits; Jasmin Arrich; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.