Literature DB >> 19019792

The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk.

Tae Won Kim1, John H Christy, Stefan Dennenmoser, Jae C Choe.   

Abstract

When females search for mates and their perceived risk of predation increases, they less often express preferences for males that use conspicuous courtship signals, relaxing sexual selection on production of these signals. Here, we report an apparent exception to this general pattern. Courting male fiddler crabs Uca beebei sometimes build pillars of mud at the openings to their burrows in which crabs mate. Females visit several males before they choose a mate by staying and breeding in their burrows, and they preferentially visit males with pillars. Previous studies suggested that this preference is based on a visual orientation behaviour that may reduce females' risk of predation while searching for a mate. We tested this idea by determining whether the female preference for males with pillars increases with perceived predation risk. We attracted avian predators to where crabs were courting and measured the rates that sexually receptive females visited courting males with and without mud pillars. Under elevated risk, females continued to search for mates and they showed a stronger relative preference for males with pillars. Thus, when predation risk is high, females may continue to express preferences that are under natural selection because they help females avoid predation, strengthening sexual selection for use of the preferred signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19019792      PMCID: PMC2660929          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D Jennions; A P Møller; M Petrie
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 2.  Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  J S Kotiaho
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

Review 3.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; David Houle; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Predation risk as a cost of reproduction.

Authors:  C Magnhagen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-05

8.  The costs of choice in sexual selection.

Authors:  A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe.

Authors:  Tae Won Kim; John H Christy; Jae C Choe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Matthias Schulte; Nina Herrmann; Michael Tobler; Stefan Stadler; Christian T Jung; Benjamin Kunkel; Rüdiger Riesch; Sebastian Klaus; Madlen Ziege; Jeane Rimber Indy; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Monoaminergic integration of diet and social signals in the brains of juvenile spadefoot toads.

Authors:  Sabrina S Burmeister; Verónica G Rodriguez Moncalvo; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Is female preference for large sexual ornaments due to a bias to escape predation risk?

Authors:  Zhen Zhu; Tae Won Kim; Jae Chun Choe
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Why do ovigerous females approach courting males? Female preferences and sensory biases in a fiddler crab.

Authors:  Chun-Chia Chou; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Not what it looks like: mate-searching behaviour, mate preferences and clutch production in wandering and territory-holding female fiddler crabs.

Authors:  M Peso; E Curran; P R Y Backwell
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 7.  A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.

Authors:  Andrew D Cronin; Judith A H Smit; Matías I Muñoz; Armand Poirier; Peter A Moran; Paul Jerem; Wouter Halfwerk
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 8.  A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility.

Authors:  Malin Ah-King; Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Choosing a mate in a high predation environment: Female preference in the fiddler crab Uca terpsichores.

Authors:  Daniela M Perez; John H Christy; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.