BACKGROUND: Delayed puberty can be due to either constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH). Differentiating between the two using current testing can be difficult. We assessed the utility of a GnRH test in combination with a 3-d and 19-d human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test to discriminate between the two conditions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 43 boys with pubertal delay who required pubertal induction with testosterone. All were followed through puberty; 29 were subsequently diagnosed with CDGP and 14 with HH. A standard GnRH test (2.5 microg/kg) was undertaken and was followed by a short [3 d; n = 38 (13 HH, 25 CDGP)] or extended [19 d; n = 31 (12 HH, 19 CDGP)] HCG stimulation test, or both [n = 27 (11 HH, 16 CDGP)]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the performance of the tests. RESULTS: Peak testosterone concentrations to both 3-d and 19-d HCG tests were significantly lower in patients with HH compared with CDGP. The 19-d test performed better than the 3-d test, and a combination of the LHRH, 3-d and 19 d HCG test [peak LH cutoff, 2.8 U/liter; peak 3-d testosterone cutoff, 1.04 microg/liter (3.6 nmol/liter); peak 19-d testosterone cutoff, 2.75 microg/liter (9.5 nmol/liter)] gave a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a GnRH test in combination with both a 3-d and 19-d HCG test may aid in differentiating between CDGP and HH.
BACKGROUND: Delayed puberty can be due to either constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH). Differentiating between the two using current testing can be difficult. We assessed the utility of a GnRH test in combination with a 3-d and 19-d human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test to discriminate between the two conditions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 43 boys with pubertal delay who required pubertal induction with testosterone. All were followed through puberty; 29 were subsequently diagnosed with CDGP and 14 with HH. A standard GnRH test (2.5 microg/kg) was undertaken and was followed by a short [3 d; n = 38 (13 HH, 25 CDGP)] or extended [19 d; n = 31 (12 HH, 19 CDGP)] HCG stimulation test, or both [n = 27 (11 HH, 16 CDGP)]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the performance of the tests. RESULTS: Peak testosterone concentrations to both 3-d and 19-d HCG tests were significantly lower in patients with HH compared with CDGP. The 19-d test performed better than the 3-d test, and a combination of the LHRH, 3-d and 19 d HCG test [peak LH cutoff, 2.8 U/liter; peak 3-d testosterone cutoff, 1.04 microg/liter (3.6 nmol/liter); peak 19-d testosterone cutoff, 2.75 microg/liter (9.5 nmol/liter)] gave a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a GnRH test in combination with both a 3-d and 19-d HCG test may aid in differentiating between CDGP and HH.
Authors: Angela K Lucas-Herald; Andreas Kyriakou; Malika Alimussina; Guilherme Guaragna-Filho; Louise A Diver; Ruth McGowan; Karen Smith; Jane D McNeilly; S Faisal Ahmed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ulrich Boehm; Pierre-Marc Bouloux; Mehul T Dattani; Nicolas de Roux; Catherine Dodé; Leo Dunkel; Andrew A Dwyer; Paolo Giacobini; Jean-Pierre Hardelin; Anders Juul; Mohamad Maghnie; Nelly Pitteloud; Vincent Prevot; Taneli Raivio; Manuel Tena-Sempere; Richard Quinton; Jacques Young Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Maria Camila Suarez A; Joseph M Israeli; Eliyahu Kresch; Leon Telis; Daniel E Nassau Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Hemchand K Prasad; Vaman V Khadilkar; Rahul Jahagirdar; Anuradha V Khadilkar; Sanjay K Lalwani Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-05
Authors: S Faisal Ahmed; John C Achermann; Wiebke Arlt; Adam Balen; Gerry Conway; Zoe Edwards; Sue Elford; Ieuan A Hughes; Louise Izatt; Nils Krone; Harriet Miles; Stuart O'Toole; Les Perry; Caroline Sanders; Margaret Simmonds; Andrew Watt; Debbie Willis Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.478