Literature DB >> 19017510

Antiarrhythmic effect of reverse ventricular remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy: the InSync ICD (Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) Italian Registry.

Luigi Di Biase1, Maurizio Gasparini, Maurizio Lunati, Massimo Santini, Maurizio Landolina, Giuseppe Boriani, Antonio Curnis, Mario Bocchiardo, Antonio Vincenti, Alessandra Denaro, Sergio Valsecchi, Andrea Natale, Luigi Padeletti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) might reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).
BACKGROUND: It is currently debated whether CRT has an effect on the burden of VAs.
METHODS: The study included 398 patients treated with a CRT defibrillator and with a follow-up of at least 12 months. Spontaneous VAs detected by the device were reviewed and validated.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in VA episodes and shock therapies was evident during the follow-up with greater decrease after 1 month. After 6 months of CRT, 227 patients (57%) showed a reduction in end-systolic volume of >or=10% and were defined as "responders." The baseline characteristics were similar between the responders and the nonresponders. Nonetheless, the proportion of patients with recurrence of VA after 1 month of CRT was significantly lower in responders (32% vs. 43%, p = 0.024). Among baseline variables no parameters emerged as predictors of tachyarrhythmia recurrence. However, receiver-operating curve analysis recognized a reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months of 13% as the best cutoff to identify the reduction of VAs (with a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 54%).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with CRT defibrillators, a reduction in ventricular arrhythmic events occurs during the initial 12 months after implant and is correlated with the degree of ventricular remodeling induced by the therapy. Patients demonstrating reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up show a reduction in arrhythmias soon after the implant, pronounced improvements at long-term, and a better survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19017510     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

Review 1.  The emerging role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in milder heart failure: are we implanting too late for response?

Authors:  Jason Bradfield; Noel G Boyle; Ravi Mandapati; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Electrical remodeling in dyssynchrony and resynchronization.

Authors:  Takeshi Aiba; Gordon Tomaselli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  The determinants of clinical outcome and clinical response to CRT are not the same.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Stefano Ghio
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

Authors:  Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Electrical remodeling in the failing heart.

Authors:  Takeshi Aiba; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Usama A Daimee; Yitschak Biton; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; David Cannom; Helmut Klein; Scott Solomon; Martin H Ruwald; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Paul J Wang; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 7.  Electromechanical dyssynchrony and resynchronization of the failing heart.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kirk; David A Kass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Relationship of electro-mechanical remodeling to survival rates after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jawad Kiani; Sunil Kumar Agarwal; Swapna Kamireddy; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Reduced appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced left ventricular function recovery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; Attila Roka; Steven A Lubitz; Michael R Gold; Claude Daubert; Cecilia Linde; Jan Steffel; Jagmeet P Singh; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with a reduction in ICD therapies as it improves ventricular function.

Authors:  Enrique Galve; Gerard Oristrell; Gabriel Acosta; Aida Ribera-Solé; Àngel Moya-Mitjans; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Jordi Pérez-Rodon; David García-Dorado
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.