Literature DB >> 19016726

Minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients at multiple time-points reveals high levels of concordance between molecular and immunophenotypic approaches.

Jacqueline Ryan1, Fiona Quinn, Armelle Meunier, Ludmila Boublikova, Mireille Crampe, Prerna Tewari, Aengus O'Marcaigh, Ray Stallings, Michael Neat, Ann O'Meara, Fin Breatnach, Shaun McCann, Paul Browne, Owen Smith, Mark Lawler.   

Abstract

In this single centre study of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients treated on the Medical Research Council UKALL 97/99 protocols, it was determined that minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) and 3-colour flow cytometry (FC) displayed high levels of qualitative concordance when evaluated at multiple time-points during treatment (93.38%), and a combined use of both approaches allowed a multi time-point evaluation of MRD kinetics for 90% (53/59) of the initial cohort. At diagnosis, MRD markers with sensitivity of at least 0.01% were identified by RQ-PCR detection of fusion gene transcripts, IGH/TRG rearrangements, and FC. Using a combined RQ-PCR and FC approach, the evaluation of 367 follow-up BM samples revealed that the detection of MRD >1% at Day 15 (P = 0.04), >0.01% at the end of induction (P = 0.02), >0.01% at the end of consolidation (P = 0.01), >0.01% prior to the first delayed intensification (P = 0.01), and >0.1% prior to the second delayed intensification and continued maintenance (P = 0.001) were all associated with relapse and, based on early time-points (end of induction and consolidation) a significant log-rank trend (P = 0.0091) was noted between survival curves for patients stratified into high, intermediate and low-risk MRD groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19016726     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07429.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  19 in total

1.  Identification of residual leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: verification of leukemic state by flow-sorting and molecular/cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Nina F Øbro; Lars P Ryder; Hans O Madsen; Mette K Andersen; Birgitte Lausen; Henrik Hasle; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Hanne V Marquart
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Recommendations for the assessment and management of measurable residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A consensus of North American experts.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour; Maher Albitar; Marcos de Lima; Lia Gore; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Aaron C Logan; Jae Park; Farhad Ravandi; Bijal Shah; Jerald Radich; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Relationship between minimal residual disease measured by multiparametric flow cytometry prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Izaskun Elorza; Carlos Palacio; Jose Luis Dapena; Laura Gallur; José Sánchez de Toledo; Cristina Díaz de Heredia
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Time point-dependent concordance of flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gaipa; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Renate Panzer-Grümayer; Barbara Buldini; Daniela Silvestri; Leonid Karawajew; Oscar Maglia; Richard Ratei; Alessandra Benetello; Simona Sala; Angela Schumich; Andre Schrauder; Tiziana Villa; Marinella Veltroni; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Valentino Conter; Martin Schrappe; Andrea Biondi; Michael N Dworzak; Giuseppe Basso
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene high-throughput sequencing quantifies minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and predicts post-transplantation relapse and survival.

Authors:  Aaron C Logan; Nikita Vashi; Malek Faham; Victoria Carlton; Katherine Kong; Ismael Buño; Jianbiao Zheng; Martin Moorhead; Mark Klinger; Bing Zhang; Amna Waqar; James L Zehnder; David B Miklos
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How to Recognize and Treat It.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  End of induction minimal residual disease alone is not a useful determinant for risk stratified therapy in pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Chintan Parekh; Paul S Gaynon; Hisham Abdel-Azim
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 9.  Should minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia be standard of care?

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Adult B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Olga Sala Torra; Megan Othus; David W Williamson; Brent Wood; Ilan Kirsch; Harlan Robins; Lan Beppu; Margaret R O'Donnell; Stephen J Forman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Jerald P Radich
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.