Literature DB >> 19016341

Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies in beef cattle in three southern states of Mexico.

Zeferino Garcia-Vazquez1, Rodrigo Rosario-Cruz, Felix Mejia-Estrada, Ivan Rodriguez-Vivas, Dora Romero-Salas, Manuel Fernandez-Ruvalcaba, Carlos Cruz-Vazquez.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to examine the seroprevalence of neosporosis in beef herds from three southern states of Mexico and determine the association with several risk factors. A cross-sectional serological survey for Neospora caninum was carried out by sampling a total of 596 animals from 31 herds in Chiapas, Veracruz, and Yucatan States and tested using an ELISA assay (IDEXX) to detect anti-N. caninum antibodies. The overall prevalence was 11.6%, (95% CI: 0.93-0.14), however, the prevalence for Chiapas was 15% (30/200) (95% CI: 0.11-0.21), in Yucatan 11.3% (21/186) (95% CI: 0.07-0.17) and in Veracruz 8.6% (18/210) (95% CI: 0.05-0.13). Of the 596 serum samples taken, 578 were from females and 18 were bulls., Only one bull sample was found seropositive from one herd in Veracruz State. The overall herd-prevalence was 70.9% (22/31) (95% CI: 0.53-0.84), and by State was: Chiapas 90% (9/10) (95% CI: 0.60-0.98); Yucatan 72.7% (8/12) (95% CI: 0.39-0.86); and Veracruz 50% (5/10) (95% CI: 0.24-0.76), respectively. The highest age-prevalences were found in animals 1 yr old (19.4% [95% CI: 0.01-0.35]) and 4 yrs old (19.6% [95% CI: 0.12-0.29]), and the lowest in animals 3 -yrs of age (6.2%,[95% CI: 0.02-0.20]). No association was found among all the variables tested in this study since most of the ranches have similar management conditions. In conclusion, N. caninum infection is common among beef herds in the Mexican tropics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19016341     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-008-9247-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  21 in total

1.  Detection of Neospora caninum in the semen and blood of naturally infected bulls.

Authors:  Ignacio Ferre; Gorka Aduriz; Itziar Del-Pozo; Javier Regidor-Cerrillo; Raquel Atxaerandio; Esther Collantes-Fernández; Ana Hurtado; Carlos Ugarte-Garagalza; Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Towards evaluating the economic impact of bovine neosporosis.

Authors:  A J Trees; H C Davison; E A Innes; J M Wastling
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.981

3.  Congenital Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle and associated calfhood mortality.

Authors:  J Paré; M C Thurmond; S K Hietala
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Neospora caninum: oocyst challenge of pregnant cows.

Authors:  A J Trees; M M McAllister; C S Guy; J W McGarry; R F Smith; D J L Williams
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Comparison of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in cattle.

Authors:  W Wapenaar; H W Barkema; J A Vanleeuwen; J T McClure; R M O'Handley; O C H Kwok; P Thulliez; J P Dubey; M C Jenkins
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Financial analysis of various strategies for the control of Neospora caninum in dairy cattle in Switzerland.

Authors:  Barbara Häsler; Gertraud Regula; Katharina D C Stärk; Heinz Sager; Bruno Gottstein; Martin Reist
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Estimation of vertical and horizontal transmission parameters of Neospora caninum infections in dairy cattle.

Authors:  H C Davison; A Otter; A J Trees
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  Neospora caninum in cattle: experimental infection with oocysts can result in exogenous transplacental infection, but not endogenous transplacental infection in the subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  C M McCann; M M McAllister; L F P Gondim; R F Smith; P J Cripps; A Kipar; D J L Williams; A J Trees
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.981

9.  Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle.

Authors:  C Björkman; O Johansson; S Stenlund; O J Holmdahl; A Uggla
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum.

Authors:  Luis F P Gondim; Milton M McAllister; William C Pitt; Doris E Zemlicka
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.981

View more
  3 in total

1.  An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle.

Authors:  Lucía M Campero; Javier Moreno-Gonzalo; María C Venturini; Gastón Moré; Andrea Dellarupe; Magdalena Rambeaud; Ignacio E Echaide; Beatriz Valentini; Carlos M Campero; Dadín P Moore; Dora B Cano; Marcelo Fort; Rinaldo A Mota; Marcos E Serrano-Martínez; Carlos Cruz-Vázquez; Luis M Ortega-Mora; Gema Álvarez-García
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in slaughtered native cattle in Kurdistan province, Iran.

Authors:  Heidar Heidari; Abdolmajid Mohammadzadeh; Jamal Gharekhani
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.054

3.  Neospora caninum Infection during the First Gestation of Holstein Heifers That Consume Food Contaminated Naturally with Zearalenone under Field Conditions.

Authors:  Carlos Cruz-Vázquez; Juan Vital-Gutiérrez; Leticia Medina-Esparza; Luis Ortega-Mora; Arturo Valdivia-Flores; Teódulo Quezada-Tristán; Agustín Orihuela-Trujillo
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.