Literature DB >> 19015580

Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy.

Katja M Langen1, Weiguo Lu, Wilfred Ngwa, Twyla R Willoughby, Bhavin Chauhan, Sanford L Meeks, Patrick A Kupelian, Gustavo Olivera.   

Abstract

The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was investigated for helical tomotherapy treatments. Measured motion tracks were used to calculate the dosimetric impact on delivered target dose distributions. A dynamic dose calculation engine was developed to facilitate this evaluation. It was found that the D95% (minimum dose to 95% of the volume) changes in the prostate were well correlated with D95% changes in the PTV. This means that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion is not restricted to the periphery of the target. The amount of motion was not well correlated with the dosimetric impact (measured in target D95% changes) of motion. The relationship between motion and its dosimetric impact is complex and depends on the timing and direction of the movement. These findings have implications for motion management techniques. It appears that the use of target margins is not an effective strategy to protect the prostate from the effects of observed intrafraction motion. The complex relationship between motion and its dosimetric effect renders simple threshold-based intervention schemes inefficient. Monitoring of actual prostate motion would allow the documentation of the dosimetric impact and implementation of corrective action if needed. However, when motion management techniques are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that the dosimetric impact of observed prostate motion is small for the majority of fractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19015580     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Reduction of dosimetric impact of intrafractional prostate motion during helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  V Prokic; H Geinitz; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Empirical estimation of beam-on time for prostate cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Małgorzata Skórska; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-02-04

4.  The dosimetric effect of intrafraction prostate motion on step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: magnitude, correlation with motion parameters, and comparison with helical tomotherapy plans.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Bhavin Chauhan; Jeffrey V Siebers; Joseph Moore; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Image guided dose escalated prostate radiotherapy: still room to improve.

Authors:  Jarad M Martin; Andrew Bayley; Robert Bristow; Peter Chung; Mary Gospodarowicz; Cynthia Menard; Michael Milosevic; Tara Rosewall; Padraig R Warde; Charles N Catton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Late toxicity for prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Elona Cekani; José Luis López-Guerra; Rodrigo Barrientos; Patricia Tavera; Juan Manuel Praena-Fernandez; Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Ignacio Azinovic; Raul Matute
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 7.  Expanding the use of real-time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Amish P Shah; Patrick A Kupelian; Twyla R Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Towards a Clinical Decision Support System for External Beam Radiation Oncology Prostate Cancer Patients: Proton vs. Photon Radiotherapy? A Radiobiological Study of Robustness and Stability.

Authors:  Seán Walsh; Erik Roelofs; Peter Kuess; Yvonka van Wijk; Ben Vanneste; Andre Dekker; Philippe Lambin; Bleddyn Jones; Dietmar Georg; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  The effect of interfraction prostate motion on IMRT plans: a dose-volume histogram analysis using a Gaussian error function model.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Daniel Markel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Simulating intrafraction prostate motion with a random walk model.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Jung Hun Oh; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.