Literature DB >> 1901511

Difference in label length between demethylchlortetracycline and oxytetracycline: implications for the interpretation of bone histomorphometric data.

A M Parfitt1, J Foldes, A R Villanueva, M S Shih.   

Abstract

We measured the individual lengths of fluorescent labels on the three subdivisions of the endosteal envelope in iliac bone biopsy specimens produced by the administration of both oxytetracycline and demethylchlortetracycline. Fifty-one healthy subjects and 53 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis were labeled in the stated order, and 8 osteopenic patients were labeled in the reverse order. Whatever the order of administration, the demethylchlortetracycline label was longer than the oxytetracycline label. We conclude: (1) the difference in label lengths reflects a difference between the two compounds in some intrinsic property, whether physical, chemical, or pharmacokinetic. (2) If the calculation of extent of mineralizing surface is based on the mean length of the two labels, a suitable correction should be applied to the shorter label; alternatively, the length of the longer label alone should be used. (3) Unlabeled osteoid not due to label escape probably results from slow terminal mineralization after cessation of matrix synthesis during which too few tetracycline molecules are incorporated to exceed the threshold for visible fluorescence, rather than from the temporary interruption of mineralization followed by its resumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1901511     DOI: 10.1007/bf02555869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  Tetracycline bone labeling.

Authors:  H M FROST; A R VILLANUEVA; H ROTH; S STANISAVLJEVIC
Journal:  J New Drugs       Date:  1961 Sep-Oct

2.  Clinical pharmacology of the tetracycline antibiotics.

Authors:  C M KUNIN; M FINLAND
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1961 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Label escape theory revisited: the effects of resting periods and section thickness.

Authors:  R B Martin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

6.  Bone appositional rate and percentage of doubly and singly labeled surfaces: comparison of data from 5 and 20 microns sections.

Authors:  D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel; J C Birkenhäger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Reconstruction of the formative site in iliac trabecular bone in 20 normal individuals employing a kinetic model for matrix and mineral apposition.

Authors:  E F Eriksen; H J Gundersen; F Melsen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Metab Bone Dis Relat Res       Date:  1984

8.  Metabolic bone disease with and without osteomalacia after intestinal bypass surgery: a bone histomorphometric study.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; J Pødenphant; A R Villanueva; B Frame
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A classification of in vivo bone labels after double labeling in canine bones.

Authors:  M Hori; H Takahashi; T Konno; J Inoue; T Haba
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Irreversible bone loss in osteomalacia. Comparison of radial photon absorptiometry with iliac bone histomorphometry during treatment.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; D S Rao; J Stanciu; A R Villanueva; M Kleerekoper; B Frame
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 14.808

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Bone adaptation in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mei-Shu Shih
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Differential Effects of Teriparatide and Denosumab on Intact PTH and Bone Formation Indices: AVA Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  David W Dempster; Hua Zhou; Robert R Recker; Jacques P Brown; Christopher P Recknor; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; Sudhaker D Rao; David L Kendler; Robert Lindsay; John H Krege; Jahangir Alam; Kathleen A Taylor; Boris Janos; Valerie A Ruff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  David W Dempster; Juliet E Compston; Marc K Drezner; Francis H Glorieux; John A Kanis; Hartmut Malluche; Pierre J Meunier; Susan M Ott; Robert R Recker; A Michael Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Interest of Bone Histomorphometry in Bone Pathophysiology Investigation: Foundation, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Pascale Chavassieux; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.