PURPOSE: To determine the late effects of radiotherapy (RT) on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2), and osteopontin (OPN) expression in cancer and stromal cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LS174T xenografted athymic mice were used as a tumor model. Radiation was delivered in two equivalent fractionation schemes: 5 x 7 Gy and 1 x 20 Gy, the latter at two dose rates. RESULTS: Tumor growth arrest was similar in all treatment groups, with the exception of a better response of small-size tumors in the 5 x 7-Gy group. The host VEGF and OPN levels were directly proportional to the tumor doubling time and were independent of the fractionation scheme. The host and cancer cell VEGFR2 levels in tumor were also directly related to the tumor response to RT. CONCLUSION: Upregulated VEGFR2 in cancer cells suggest paracrine signaling in the VEGFR2 pathway of cancer cells as the factor contributing to RT failure. The transient activation of the host VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway in tumor supports the model of angiogenic regeneration and suggests that radiation-induced upregulation of VEGF, VEGFR2, and downstream proteins might contribute to RT failure by escalating the rate of vascular repair. Coexpression of host OPN and VEGF, two factors closely associated with angiogenesis, indicate that OPN can serve as a surrogate marker of tumor recovery after RT. Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes, the scheduling of RT and antiangiogenic therapies will require patient-specific post-treatment monitoring of the VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway and that tumor-associated OPN can serve as an indicator of tumor regrowth.
PURPOSE: To determine the late effects of radiotherapy (RT) on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2), and osteopontin (OPN) expression in cancer and stromal cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LS174T xenografted athymic mice were used as a tumor model. Radiation was delivered in two equivalent fractionation schemes: 5 x 7 Gy and 1 x 20 Gy, the latter at two dose rates. RESULTS:Tumor growth arrest was similar in all treatment groups, with the exception of a better response of small-size tumors in the 5 x 7-Gy group. The host VEGF and OPN levels were directly proportional to the tumor doubling time and were independent of the fractionation scheme. The host and cancer cell VEGFR2 levels in tumor were also directly related to the tumor response to RT. CONCLUSION: Upregulated VEGFR2 in cancer cells suggest paracrine signaling in the VEGFR2 pathway of cancer cells as the factor contributing to RT failure. The transient activation of the host VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway in tumor supports the model of angiogenic regeneration and suggests that radiation-induced upregulation of VEGF, VEGFR2, and downstream proteins might contribute to RT failure by escalating the rate of vascular repair. Coexpression of host OPN and VEGF, two factors closely associated with angiogenesis, indicate that OPN can serve as a surrogate marker of tumor recovery after RT. Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes, the scheduling of RT and antiangiogenic therapies will require patient-specific post-treatment monitoring of the VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway and that tumor-associated OPN can serve as an indicator of tumor regrowth.
Authors: M I Koukourakis; A Giatromanolaki; E Sivridis; K Simopoulos; G Pissakas; K C Gatter; A L Harris Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: S Dias; K Hattori; B Heissig; Z Zhu; Y Wu; L Witte; D J Hicklin; M Tateno; P Bohlen; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H Gille; J Kowalski; B Li; J LeCouter; B Moffat; T F Zioncheck; N Pelletier; N Ferrara Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Vinay K Gupta; Nora T Jaskowiak; Michael A Beckett; Helena J Mauceri; Jeremy Grunstein; Randall S Johnson; Douglas A Calvin; Edwardine Nodzenski; Marija Pejovic; Donald W Kufe; Mitchell C Posner; Ralph R Weichselbaum Journal: Cancer J Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: P Manders; L V A M Beex; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; J Geurts-Moespot; T H Van Tienoven; J A Foekens; C G J Sweep Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-09-23 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Li Cui; Dwight Pierce; Kim E Light; Russell B Melchert; Qiang Fu; K Sree Kumar; Martin Hauer-Jensen Journal: Curr Neurovasc Res Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Michael I Koukourakis; Ioannis M Koukourakis; Stella Arelaki; Maria Kouroupi; Spyros Domoxoudis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: S Sjöström; C Wibom; U Andersson; T Brännström; H Broholm; C Johansen; H Collatz-Laier; Y Liu; M Bondy; R Henriksson; B Melin Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 4.130