PURPOSE: We compared clonogenic survival in 27 human tumor cell lines that vary in genotype after low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) irradiation. We measured susceptibility to LDR-induced redistribution in the cell cycle in eight of these cell lines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We measured clonogenic survival after up to 96 hours of LDR (0.25 Gy/h) irradiation. We compared these with clonogenic survival after HDR irradiation (50 Gy/h). Using flow cytometry, we measured LDR-induced redistribution as a function of time during LDR irradiation in eight of these cell lines. RESULTS: Coefficients that describe clonogenic survival after both LDR and HDR irradiation segregate into four radiosensitivity groups that associate with cell genotype: mutant (mut)ATM, wild-type TP53, mutTP53, and an unidentified gene in radioresistant glioma cells. The LDR and HDR radiosensitivity correlates at lower doses ( approximately 2 Gy HDR, approximately 6 Gy LDR), but not at higher doses (HDR > 4 Gy; LDR > 6 Gy). The rate of LDR-induced loss of clonogenic survival changes at approximately 24 hours; wild-type TP53 cells become more resistant and mutTP53 cells become more sensitive. Redistribution induced by LDR irradiation also changes at approximately 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosensitivity of human tumor cells to both LDR and HDR irradiation is genotype dependent. Analysis of coefficients that describe cellular radiosensitivity segregates 27 cell lines into four statistically distinct groups, each associating with specific genotypes. Changes in cellular radiosensitivity and redistribution in the cell cycle are strongly time dependent. Our data establish a genotype-dependent time-dependent model that predicts clonogenic survival, explains the inverse dose-rate effect, and suggests possible clinical applications.
PURPOSE: We compared clonogenic survival in 27 humantumor cell lines that vary in genotype after low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) irradiation. We measured susceptibility to LDR-induced redistribution in the cell cycle in eight of these cell lines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We measured clonogenic survival after up to 96 hours of LDR (0.25 Gy/h) irradiation. We compared these with clonogenic survival after HDR irradiation (50 Gy/h). Using flow cytometry, we measured LDR-induced redistribution as a function of time during LDR irradiation in eight of these cell lines. RESULTS: Coefficients that describe clonogenic survival after both LDR and HDR irradiation segregate into four radiosensitivity groups that associate with cell genotype: mutant (mut)ATM, wild-type TP53, mutTP53, and an unidentified gene in radioresistant glioma cells. The LDR and HDR radiosensitivity correlates at lower doses ( approximately 2 Gy HDR, approximately 6 Gy LDR), but not at higher doses (HDR > 4 Gy; LDR > 6 Gy). The rate of LDR-induced loss of clonogenic survival changes at approximately 24 hours; wild-type TP53 cells become more resistant and mutTP53 cells become more sensitive. Redistribution induced by LDR irradiation also changes at approximately 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosensitivity of humantumor cells to both LDR and HDR irradiation is genotype dependent. Analysis of coefficients that describe cellular radiosensitivity segregates 27 cell lines into four statistically distinct groups, each associating with specific genotypes. Changes in cellular radiosensitivity and redistribution in the cell cycle are strongly time dependent. Our data establish a genotype-dependent time-dependent model that predicts clonogenic survival, explains the inverse dose-rate effect, and suggests possible clinical applications.
Authors: J J Gordon; K Snyder; H Zhong; K Barton; Z Sun; I J Chetty; M Matuszak; R K Ten Haken Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Matthäus Felsenstein; Maria A Trujillo; Bo Huang; Neha Nanda; Zhengdong Jiang; Yea Ji Jeong; Michael Pflüger; Michael G Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Elizabeth D Thompson; Christopher M Heaphy; Nicholas J Roberts; Laura D Wood Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Vicente Valero; Tyler J Saunders; Jin He; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Avani Dholakia; Aaron T Wild; Eun Ji Shin; Mouen A Khashab; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Syed Z Ali; Daniel Laheru; Ralph H Hruban; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Joseph M Herman; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bastiaan M Privé; Yvonne H W Derks; Florian Rosar; Gerben M Franssen; Steffie M B Peters; Fadi Khreish; Mark Bartholomä; Stephan Maus; Martin Gotthardt; Peter Laverman; Mark W Konijnenberg; Samer Ezziddin; James Nagarajah; Sandra Heskamp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Francesco Marampon; Silvia Codenotti; Francesca Megiorni; Andrea Del Fattore; Simona Camero; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Claudio Festuccia; Daniela Musio; Francesca De Felice; Valerio Nardone; Anna Natalizia Santoro; Carlo Dominici; Alessandro Fanzani; Luigi Pirtoli; Antonella Fioravanti; Vincenzo Tombolini; Sara Cheleschi; Paolo Tini Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.553