| Literature DB >> 19014631 |
Claudia Mazzà1, Marco Iosa, Fabrizio Pecoraro, Aurelio Cappozzo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The control of the head movements during walking allows for the stabilisation of the optic flow, for a more effective processing of the vestibular system signals, and for the consequent control of equilibrium.In young individuals, the oscillations of the upper body during level walking are characterised by an attenuation of the linear acceleration going from pelvis to head level. In elderly subjects the ability to implement this motor strategy is reduced. The aim of this paper is to go deeper into the mechanisms through which the head accelerations are controlled during level walking, in both young and elderly women specifically.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19014631 PMCID: PMC2596778 DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-30
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil ISSN: 1743-0003 Impact factor: 4.262
Gait spatio-temporal parameters
| YG | EG | |||
| CS | FS | CS | FS | |
| WS [ms-1] | 1.30 (0.07) | 2.32 (0.05) | 0.97 (0.04)* | 1.59 (0.04)* |
| SL [m] | 1.39 (0.04) | 1.61 (0.04) | 1.14 (0.04)* | 1.25 (0.03)* |
| SF [s-1] | 0.93 (0.03) | 1.47 (0.04) | 0.85 (0.02) | 1.30 (0.02)* |
| Fn | 0.20 (0.02) | 0.63 (0.03) | 0.12 (0.01)* | 0.31 (0.01)* |
Mean (s.e.m.) values of the spatio-temporal parameters (WS = walking speed; SL = stride length; SF = stride frequency; Fn = Froude number) for the young (YG) and elderly (EG) groups walking at comfortable (CS) and fast (FS) speed. * = significant difference between the values of the two groups (p < 0.05, t-test).
ANOVA of the harmonic ratios
| Harmonic Ratio | Age | Condition | Age × Condition | ||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
| AP | H | 0.26 | 0.614 | 17.39 | 6.12 | ||
| S | 0.08 | 0.783 | 22.58 | 7.99 | |||
| P | 5.38 | 3.05 | 0.090 | 2.65 | 0.113 | ||
| ML | H | 3.26 | 0.080 | 30.53 | 1.06 | 0.311 | |
| S | 0.08 | 0.783 | 22.58 | 7.99 | |||
| P | 0.01 | 0.956 | 22.68 | 1.11 | 0.300 | ||
| V | H | 6.29 | 7.59 | 1.20 | 0.282 | ||
| S | 0.46 | 0.500 | 12.13 | 3.46 | 0.071 | ||
| P | 4.26 | 7.57 | 2.69 | 0.110 | |||
F and p-values resulting from the repeated measures two-way ANOVA performed on the harmonic ratio values computed at the three body levels (H, S, P) in the three directions (AP, ML, V). Age = between subjects factor; Condition = within subject factors. Bold values: p < 0.05.
Harmonic ratio values
| Harmonic Ratio | YG | EG | |||||
| CS | FS | Δ (%) | CS | FS | Δ (%) | ||
| AP | H | 2.96 (0.40) | 1.60 (0.18) | -46% | 2.60 (0.21) | 2.26 (0.18) | -13% |
| S | 5.48 (0.70) | 2.41 (0.44) | -56% | 4.19 (0.33) | 3.41 (0.40) | -19% | |
| P | 8.85 (0.79) | 6.70 (0.90) | N.S. | 6.12 (0.39) | 6.05 (0.66) | N.S. | |
| ML | H | 3.00 (0.29) | 1.78 (0.21) | -41% | 3.84 (0.40) | 2.06 (0.17) | -46% |
| S | 3.40 (0.29) | 2.17 (0.47) | -36% | 4.70 (0.54) | 2.40 (0.21) | -49% | |
| P | 2.86 (0.22) | 2.04 (0.36) | -29% | 3.11 (0.33) | 1.82 (0.21) | -42% | |
| V | H | 16.34 (1.31) | 11.13 (1.79) | -32% | 11.26 (1.07) | 9.01 (1.39) | -20% |
| S | 17.57 (1.83) | 10.33 (1.65) | -41% | 13.72 (1.49) | 11.52 (1.72) | -16% | |
| P | 17.04 (1.83) | 11.70 (1.56) | -31% | 11.60 (0.78) | 10.25 (1.59) | -11% | |
Mean (s.e.m.) values of the Harmonic Ratios computed at each body level (H, S, P) and in each direction (AP, ML, V) for the two groups (YG, CG). When significant, the variation (Δ) of the Harmonic Ratio between the comfortable (CS) and the fast speed (FS) conditions is reported as a percentage of the CS value (t-test, p < 0.05; N.S. = not significant).
Figure 1Acceleration RMS values. The figure shows the mean ± s.e.m. values of the RMS of the accelerations computed for the two groups at pelvis, shoulder and head level in the two experimental conditions. * = significant difference between YG (black points) and EG (grey points).
Analysis of variance on RMS
| RMS | Age | Condition | Age × Condition | ||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
| AP | H | 0.19 | 0.667 | 58.18 | 0.96 | 0.334 | |
| S | 9.71 | 17.07 | 1.18 | 0.280 | |||
| P | 22.88 | 123.17 | 3.37 | 0.075 | |||
| ML | H | 0.56 | 0.460 | 51.38 | 3.27 | 0.079 | |
| S | 0.11 | 0.741 | 39.65 | 6.12 | |||
| P | 7.19 | 75.23 | 18.85 | ||||
| V | H | 25.30 | 51.27 | 1.13 | 0.296 | ||
| S | 16.46 | 64.56 | 0.15 | 0.703 | |||
| P | 22.82 | 57.46 | 1.05 | 0.313 | |||
F and p-values resulting from the repeated measures two-way ANOVA performed on the RMS values of the accelerations computed at the three body levels (H, S, P) in the three directions (AP, ML, V). Age = between subjects factor. Condition = within subject factors. Bold values: p < 0.05.
Figure 2RMS vs F. The figure shows the RMS values (and the relevant linear regression) of the head (light empty circles) and pelvis (dark filled circles) accelerations plotted as a function of the Froude number Fn.
Figure 3Coefficients of attenuation. The figure shows the mean ± s.e.m. values of the three coefficients of attenuation as computed for the young (black bars) and the elderly (grey bars) groups at comfortable (filled bars) and fast (rayed bars) speed. Results of the ANOVA have also been reported: * = age effect; ° = condition effect; ^ = interaction effect; p < 0.05.