Literature DB >> 190145

Differences between laboratory strains of Epstein-Barr virus based on immortalization, abortive infection and interference.

G Miller, J Robinson, L Heston, M Lipman.   

Abstract

Biological activities of extracellular Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) from two laboratory strains, namely P3J-HR-1 (P-H) from Burkitt's lymphoma and B95-8 (B95) from infectious mononucleosis, were compared. Virus stocks from both sources contained approximately the same number of virions. Virus from the P-H line induced early antigen in six non-producer EBV-genome carrier cell lines; virus from B95 did not induce early antigen. Extracellular virus from B95 regularly caused lymphocytes from human umbilical cords to form continuous lines (immortalization); P-H virus did not cause primary cultures of human lymphocytes to grow continuously. B95 virus stimulated DNA synthesis, as determined by the rate of incorporation of 3H-thymidine into acid-insoluble material; P-H virus did not stimulate DNA synthesis. Pretreatment of lymphocytes with undiluted P-H virus inhibited immortalization and stimulation of DNA synthesis by B95 virus. The inhibitory properties of the P-H virus were sedimented at 100 000 g and inactivated by heat and UV irradiation; interference by the P-H virus was neutralized by human serum with antibody to EBV and not by antibody-negative human serum. The hypothesis most consistent with these results is that the P-H virus is defective in gene(s) needed for initiation of immortalization. We speculate that the absence of this gene allows early antigen to be expressed upon superinfection of non-producer cell lines. The availability of two laboratory strains of two laboratory strains of EBV that differ in biological behaviour provides starting material for analysis of the mechanism of lymphocyte immortalization by EBV and of virus structural differences that affect immortalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 190145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IARC Sci Publ


  5 in total

1.  CD4+ T-cell effectors inhibit Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell proliferation.

Authors:  S Nikiforow; K Bottomly; G Miller
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  The microRNAs of Epstein-Barr Virus are expressed at dramatically differing levels among cell lines.

Authors:  Zachary L Pratt; Malika Kuzembayeva; Srikumar Sengupta; Bill Sugden
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Dendritic cells initiate immune control of epstein-barr virus transformation of B lymphocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Kara Bickham; Kiera Goodman; Casper Paludan; Sarah Nikiforow; Ming Li Tsang; Ralph M Steinman; Christian Münz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

4.  Comprehensive profiling of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded miRNA species associated with specific latency types in tumor cells.

Authors:  Hong-Jie Yang; Tie-Jun Huang; Chang-Fu Yang; Li-Xia Peng; Ran-Yi Liu; Guang-Da Yang; Qiao-Qiao Chu; Jia-Ling Huang; Na Liu; Hong-Bing Huang; Zhen-Yu Zhu; Chao-Nan Qian; Bi-Jun Huang
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Quercetin Interrupts the Positive Feedback Loop Between STAT3 and IL-6, Promotes Autophagy, and Reduces ROS, Preventing EBV-Driven B Cell Immortalization.

Authors:  Marisa Granato; Maria Saveria Gilardini Montani; Claudia Zompetta; Roberta Santarelli; Roberta Gonnella; Maria Anele Romeo; Gabriella D'Orazi; Alberto Faggioni; Mara Cirone
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.