| Literature DB >> 19014419 |
Emil Ruvinov1, Orna Sharabani-Yosef, Arnon Nagler, Tom Einbinder, Micha S Feinberg, Radka Holbova, Amos Douvdevani, Jonathan Leor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin possesses cellular protection properties. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that in situ expression of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) would improve tissue repair in rat after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS ANDEntities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19014419 PMCID: PMC2585557 DOI: 10.1186/1755-1536-1-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair ISSN: 1755-1536
EPO biological activity in vitro
| Culture | EPO ELISA (mIU/ml) | EPO activity assay (TF-1) (mIU/ml) | Activity ratio (activity/protein) |
| Mock BALB/3T3 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Transduced BALB/3T3 | 10.74 ± 0.78 | 373.3 ± 37.12* | ×35 |
| Mock neonatal fibroblasts | 0 | 0 | - |
| Transduced neonatal fibroblasts | 51.24 ± 11.17 | 576.7 ± 186.7* | ×12 |
RhEPO protein levels: the presence of rhEPO in transduced culture supernants was analyzed by a commercial ELISA kit. RhEPO biologic activity (TF-1 cell proliferation assay): EPO biological activity was analyzed using the EPO-sensitive human erythroleukemia cell line TF-1, in which proliferation and metabolic activity is EPO-dependent. *Significantly more active than rhEPO standard (Eprex), p < 0.05.
Figure 1RhEPO inhibits H Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were treated with PBS as a control or with H2O2 (150 μM) for 60 minutes in the 24 h presence or absence of rhEPO produced from transduced fibroblasts (12 mIU/ml). (A) Annexin V/PI staining: (a) Representative density profile (percentage of cells in each quadrant is indicated); (b) Quantitative analysis, showing that EPO attenuated cardiomyocyte apoptosis. (B) DAPI staining: (a) representative photomicrographs (arrows show apoptotic cardiomyocyte nuclei (chromatin condensation and nuclei fragmentation); (b) quantitative analysis, as represented by relative apoptotic nuclei counts.
Serial hematocrit measurements in rats after MI, showing that EPO-transduced cell injection does not increase systemic hematocrit levels
| Treatment time | Saline (n = 9) | EPO-transduced cells (n = 9) | Non-transduced cells (n = 9) |
| Baseline (before injection; %) | 47.5 ± 0.3 | 47.2 ± 0.2 | 47.2 ± 0.1 |
| 1 week post-injection (%) | 47.4 ± 0.2 | 47.0 ± 0.1 | 47.39 ± 0.2 |
| 4 weeks post-injection (%) | 47.4 ± 0.18 | 46.8 ± 0.2 | 47.15 ± 0.2 |
p = 1.00.
Figure 2Photomicrographs of heart sections, immunostained with anti-human erythropoietin antibodies (brown), 4 weeks after cell transplantation.(A) Human kidney positive control. (B) saline-injected heart. (C) Non-transduced fibroblast-transplanted heart. (D) RhEPO in transduced fibroblast-transplanted heart (infarct zone). Arrows show rhEPO expression.
Figure 3Four weeks after cell transplantation, rhEPO expression promotes neo-angiogenesis . (A) α-Smooth muscle actin staining (brown) in infarcted hearts (infarct border zones). Arrows show stained blood vessels. (a) Saline injection; (b) non-transduced cell injection; (c) rhEPO-transduced cell injection; (d) quantitative analysis. (B) Lectin (BS-1) staining (brown) in infarcted hearts (infarct border zones). Arrows show stained blood vessels. (a) Saline injection; (b) non-transduced cell injection; (c) rhEPO-transduced cell injection; (d) quantitative analysis.
Figure 4Four weeks after cell transplantation, rhEPO expression attenuates cardiac cell apoptosis . (A) Representative photomicrographs of active caspase-3 staining (brown) in infarcted hearts (infarct border zone). Arrows show nuclear active caspase-3 staining. (a) Human tonsil tissue (positive control); (b) saline injection; (c) non-transduced cell injection; (d) rhEPO-transduced cell injection. (B) Representative photomicrographs of TUNEL staining (brown) in infarcted hearts (infarct border zone). (a) Rat mammary gland tissue (positive control); (b) saline injection; (c) non-transduced cell injection; (d) rhEPO-transduced cell injection. (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptosis in infarcted hearts. (a) active caspase-3 staining; (b) TUNEL.
Comparison of LV remodeling and function between EPO-transduced, non-transduced cell or saline injections by two-dimensional echocardiography, before (baseline), or 5 or 9 weeks after MI
| EPO-transduced cells (n = 10) | Non-transduced cells (n = 9) | Saline (n = 9) | ||
| Heart rate | 0.17 | |||
| Baseline | 308.8 ± 12.6 | 273.8 ± 11.7 | 273.0 ± 11.6 | |
| 5 weeks | 252.7 ± 9.5 | 252.5 ± 14.0 | 262.8 ± 13.5 | |
| | 0.0068 | 0.32 | 0.55 | |
| AW d (cm) | 0.07 | |||
| Baseline | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.007 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | |
| 5 weeks | 0.09 ± 0.006 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | |
| | 0.006 | 0.0002 | 0.04 | |
| LVEDD | 0.08 | |||
| Baseline | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | |
| 5 weeks | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0009 | |
| LVESD | 0.22 | |||
| Baseline | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | |
| 5 weeks | 0.88 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| LVEDA | 0.34 | |||
| Baseline | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | |
| 5 weeks | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0011 | |
| LVESA | 0.36 | |||
| Baseline | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | |
| 5 weeks | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0004 | |
| FS (%) | 0.99 | |||
| Baseline | 20.6 ± 2.9 | 22.3 ± 1.7 | 25.07 ± 2.2 | |
| 5 weeks | 16.2 ± 1.4 | 17.8 ± 1.6 | 20.96 ± 2.0 | |
| | 0.14 | 0.008 | 0.002 | |
| Heart rate | 0.28 | |||
| Baseline | 303.2 ± 12.7 | 274.4 ± 13.3 | 273.0 ± 11.6 | |
| 9 weeks | 242.0 ± 6.3 | 235.5 ± 12.2 | 246.2 ± 7.7 | |
| | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.0014 | |
| AW d (cm) | 0.19 | |||
| Baseline | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.007 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | |
| 9 weeks | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | |
| | 0.03 | 0.0002 | 0.3 | |
| LVEDD | 0.22 | |||
| Baseline | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | |
| 9 weeks | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 1.05 ± 0.03 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0003 | |
| LVESD | 0.3 | |||
| Baseline | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | |
| 9 weeks | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| LVEDA | 0.42 | |||
| Baseline | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | |
| 9 weeks | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | |
| | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0006 | |
| LVESA | 0.37 | |||
| Baseline | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | |
| 9 weeks | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | |
| | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | |
| FS (%) | 0.09 | |||
| Baseline | 20.6 ± 2.9 | 22.3 ± 1.72 | 25.1 ± 2.2 | |
| 9 weeks | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 18.7 ± 1.73 | 19.8 ± 2.4 | |
| | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.0008 |
AW d, anterior wall diastolic thickness; LVEDD, LV end diastolic dimension; LVESD, LV end systolic dimension; LVEDA, LV end diastolic area; LVESA, LV end systolic area; FS, LV fractional shortening [(LVIDd – LVIDs)/LVIDd] × 100. Values are mean ± SEM; p*, p-values derived from paired comparisons between baseline and 5/9 week measurements; p†, p-values for the differences between groups over time (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, p-value for interaction).
Comparison of LV remodeling by postmortem morphometry, 9 weeks after MI
| EPO-transduced cells (n = 10) | Non-transduced cells (n = 9) | Saline (n = 9) | ||
| LV maximal diameter (mm) | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 6.2 ± 0. 31 | 8.1 ± 0.33 | <0.0001 |
| <0.001† | <0.001‡ | - | ||
| Average wall thickness (mm) | 1.4 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.04 | 1.4 ± 0.03 | 0.003 |
| <0.05† | <0.05‡ | - | ||
| Average scar thickness (mm) | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.05 | <0.0001 |
| <0.001§ | - | - | ||
| Relative scar thickness | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.22 |
| - | - | - | ||
| Muscle area (mm2) | 43 ± 1.4 | 43 ± 4.2 | 47 ± 2.3 | 0.55 |
| - | - | - | ||
| LV cavity area (mm2) | 57 ± 8.0 | 40 ± 4.9 | 65 ± 5.3 | 0.002 |
| <0.05† | <0.01‡ | - | ||
| Whole LV area (mm2) | 110 ± 7.5 | 77 ± 7.0 | 110 ± 7.0 | <0.0001 |
| < 0.001† | < 0.001‡ | - | ||
| Expansion index | 1.1 ± 0.08 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.13 | 0.04 |
| - | <0.05‡ | - | ||
| Epicardial scar length (mm) | 7.2 ± 1.2 | 6.5 ± 1.2 | 8.1 ± 1.6 | 0.68 |
| - | - | - | ||
| Endocardial scar length (mm) | 7.3 ± 1.6 | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 6.6 ± 1.0 | 0.65 |
| - | - | - |
Values are means ± SEM. p (Bonferroni test), p-values from Bonferroni multiple comparison test; p*, p-values for the differences between groups (one-way ANOVA). †Versus non-transduced cells; ‡versus saline; §versus saline and non-transduced cells.