Literature DB >> 1901418

Randomized double-blind study of fluvoxamine and maprotiline in treatment of depression.

F de Jonghe1, J Swinkels, H Tuynman-Qua.   

Abstract

In a six-week double-blind randomized trial, preceded by a one-week period of single-blind placebo treatment, the efficacy and the side-effects of fluvoxamine (100-300 mg/d) (n = 24) and maprotiline (50-150 mg/d) (n = 24) were compared in moderately depressed outpatients with DSM-III Major Depression (n = 22) or Dysthymic Disorder (n = 26). Efficacy was measured by means of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Zung Depression Selfrating Scale, and a Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale. Side-effects were evaluated by an Adverse Event Inventory and a Psychosomatic Symptom Scale. A statistically significant improvement was achieved in both treatment groups but success rates were modest: in both groups, 29% of the patients achieved a clinically significant improvement after six weeks of treatment. After six weeks of treatment, no difference in efficacy was found between fluvoxamine and maprotiline. Nausea was the most common complaint in the fluvoxamine group, while in the maprotiline group, it was dry mouth and constipation. One maprotiline-treated patient developed a convulsive attack.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1901418     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry        ISSN: 0176-3679            Impact factor:   5.788


  10 in total

1.  Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Trindade; D Menon; L A Topfer; C Coloma
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Cardiovascular effects of fluvoxamine and maprotiline in depressed patients.

Authors:  W Hewer; W Rost; W F Gattaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the management of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  L L Carpenter; C J McDougle; C N Epperson; L H Price
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I M Anderson; B M Tomenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

Review 5.  Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Ichiro M Omori; Norio Watanabe; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 6.  A comparison of active drugs for the treatment of dysthymia.

Authors:  M Silva de Lima; M Hotopf
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in depressive illness.

Authors:  M I Wilde; G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Comparative efficacy of antidepressants.

Authors:  S Kasper; J Fuger; H J Möller
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  F Song; N Freemantle; T A Sheldon; A House; P Watson; A Long; J Mason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

10.  Effects of anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs on long-lasting behavioural deficits resulting from one short stress experience in male rats.

Authors:  H H Van Dijken; F J Tilders; B Olivier; J Mos
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.