PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 2 common materials in sinus augmentation surgery and to assess their contribution when enriched with autogenous bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective human study was performed in 48 sinus grafting operations using beta-tricalcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone (pure or mixed with 10% to 20% autogenous bone) or autogenous bone. Biopsy specimens were taken after 9 months. Statistical evaluation was done with a 2-sample t test (P < .05). RESULTS: When autogenous bone was used, 49.2% +/- 3.1% of new bone was found, which is significantly higher than in all the other groups. A higher proportion (34.2% +/- 13.1%) of the new vital bone was found in the deproteinized bovine bone group, in comparison with the beta-tricalcium phosphate group (21.4% +/- 8.1%) and the beta-tricalcium phosphate composite graft group (24.0% +/- 6.6%; P < .05). No significant differences between single-component grafts and corresponding composite grafts were established. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus augmentation with the aforementioned augmentation materials is a well-accepted procedure. However, autogenous bone alone was the best material. More new bone was found using deproteinized bovine bone than beta-tricalcium phosphate. The addition of 10% to 20% autogenous bone to the bone substitute did not significantly influence the new bone formation.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 2 common materials in sinus augmentation surgery and to assess their contribution when enriched with autogenous bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective human study was performed in 48 sinus grafting operations using beta-tricalcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone (pure or mixed with 10% to 20% autogenous bone) or autogenous bone. Biopsy specimens were taken after 9 months. Statistical evaluation was done with a 2-sample t test (P < .05). RESULTS: When autogenous bone was used, 49.2% +/- 3.1% of new bone was found, which is significantly higher than in all the other groups. A higher proportion (34.2% +/- 13.1%) of the new vital bone was found in the deproteinized bovine bone group, in comparison with the beta-tricalcium phosphate group (21.4% +/- 8.1%) and the beta-tricalcium phosphate composite graft group (24.0% +/- 6.6%; P < .05). No significant differences between single-component grafts and corresponding composite grafts were established. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus augmentation with the aforementioned augmentation materials is a well-accepted procedure. However, autogenous bone alone was the best material. More new bone was found using deproteinized bovine bone than beta-tricalcium phosphate. The addition of 10% to 20% autogenous bone to the bone substitute did not significantly influence the new bone formation.
Authors: Bozidar M B Brkovic; Hari S Prasad; Michael D Rohrer; George Konandreas; George Agrogiannis; Dragana Antunovic; George K B Sándor Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Patricia Mazón; Sergio A Gehrke; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Piedad N De Aza Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.623