Literature DB >> 19013789

EORTC-GCG process quality indicators for ovarian cancer surgery.

L Verleye1, P B Ottevanger, W van der Graaf, N S Reed, I Vergote.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the mainstay of staging and treatment of ovarian cancer. Optimal quality of ovarian cancer surgery implies complete staging and removal of all macroscopic tumour with minimal harm to the patient in order to ensure best patient outcome. However, variation in the quality of ovarian cancer surgery is apparent. In order to assess and improve the quality of care, quality indicators can be used.
METHODS: To identify candidate quality indicators, a literature search was performed using relevant MESH terms. These were assessed for validity, feasibility and measurability.
RESULTS: Five quality indicators for staging of presumed early-stage ovarian cancer and six for primary debulking surgery for advanced disease are proposed.
CONCLUSION: The defined quality indicators can be used to monitor and improve the quality of surgery for ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19013789     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  HE4 combined with MDCT imaging is a good marker in the evaluation of disease extension in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Cecilia Midulla; Lucia Manganaro; Flavia Longo; Valentina Viggiani; Luigi Frati; Teresa Granato; Emanuela Anastasi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-03-20

2.  Cytoreductive surgery for giant locally advanced intra-abdominal tumors in Uganda.

Authors:  Michael Okello; Julius Nuwagaba; Henry Ddungu; Fred Machyo Okuku
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Observed-to-expected ratio for adherence to treatment guidelines as a quality of care indicator for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Valerie B Galvan-Turner; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Evaluation of intraoperative and postoperative complications related to lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Leszek Jaroslaw Gmyrek; Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek; Piotr Sobiczewski; Grzegorz Panek; Mariusz Bidzinski
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Clinical governance network for clinical audit to improve quality in epithelial ovarian cancer management.

Authors:  Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Martino Abrate; Pierandrea De Iaco; Debora Pirillo; Gino Ciarlini; Maurizio Leoni; Giuseppe Comerci; Alessandro Ventura; Bruno Lenzi; Andrea Amadori; Federica Rosati; Ruby Martinello; Rossana De Palma; Chiara Ventura; Laura Maria Beatrice Belotti; Debora Formisano; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Results of optimal debulking surgery with bowel resection in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Pawel Derlatka; Jacek Sienko; Laretta Grabowska-Derlatka; Piotr Palczewski; Anna Danska-Bidzinska; Mariusz Bidzinski; Krzysztof Czajkowski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Acceptability of quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer: results of an online survey.

Authors:  Annemie Luyckx; Leen Wyckmans; Anne-Sophie Bonte; Xuan Bich Trinh; Peter A van Dam
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation.

Authors:  Kahren M White; Holly Seale; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Small Peritoneal Implants in "Potentially" Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Laretta Grabowska-Derlatka; Pawel Derlatka; Wojciech Szeszkowski; Andrzej Cieszanowski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.