Ludwien Meeuwesen1, Atie van den Brink-Muinen, Geert Hofstede. 1. Interdisciplinary Social Science Department, Utrecht University, Research Institute for 'Psychology & Health', P.O. Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. l.meeuwesen@uu.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated at a country level how cross-national differences in medical communication can be understood from the first four of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, i.e. power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism and masculinity/femininity, together with national wealth. METHODS: A total of 307 general practitioners (GPs) and 5820 patients from Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland participated in the study. Medical communication was videotaped and assessed using Roter's interaction analysis system (RIAS). Additional context information of physicians (gender, job satisfaction, risk-taking and belief of psychological influence on diseases) and patients (gender, health condition, diagnosis and medical encounter expectations) was gathered by using questionnaires. RESULTS: Countries differ considerably form each other in terms of culture dimensions. The larger a nation's power distance, the less room there is for unexpected information exchange and the shorter the consultations are. Roles are clearly described and fixed. The higher the level of uncertainty avoidance, the less attention is given to rapport building, e.g. less eye contact. In 'masculine' countries there is less instrumental communication in the medical interaction, which was contrary to expectations. In wealthy countries, more attention is given to psychosocial communication. CONCLUSION: The four culture dimensions, together with countries' wealth, contribute importantly to the understanding of differences in European countries' styles of medical communication. Their predictive power reaches much further than explanations along the north/south or east/west division of Europe. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The understanding of these cross-national differences is a precondition for the prevention of intercultural miscommunication. Improved understanding may occur at microlevel in the medical encounter, as well as on macrolevel in pursuing more effective cooperation and integration of European health care policies.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated at a country level how cross-national differences in medical communication can be understood from the first four of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, i.e. power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism and masculinity/femininity, together with national wealth. METHODS: A total of 307 general practitioners (GPs) and 5820 patients from Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland participated in the study. Medical communication was videotaped and assessed using Roter's interaction analysis system (RIAS). Additional context information of physicians (gender, job satisfaction, risk-taking and belief of psychological influence on diseases) and patients (gender, health condition, diagnosis and medical encounter expectations) was gathered by using questionnaires. RESULTS: Countries differ considerably form each other in terms of culture dimensions. The larger a nation's power distance, the less room there is for unexpected information exchange and the shorter the consultations are. Roles are clearly described and fixed. The higher the level of uncertainty avoidance, the less attention is given to rapport building, e.g. less eye contact. In 'masculine' countries there is less instrumental communication in the medical interaction, which was contrary to expectations. In wealthy countries, more attention is given to psychosocial communication. CONCLUSION: The four culture dimensions, together with countries' wealth, contribute importantly to the understanding of differences in European countries' styles of medical communication. Their predictive power reaches much further than explanations along the north/south or east/west division of Europe. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The understanding of these cross-national differences is a precondition for the prevention of intercultural miscommunication. Improved understanding may occur at microlevel in the medical encounter, as well as on macrolevel in pursuing more effective cooperation and integration of European health care policies.
Authors: Anke Wind; Mark Patrick Roeling; Jana Heerink; Herman Sixma; Pietro Presti; Claudio Lombardo; Wim van Harten Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Marta Wałaszek; Małgorzata Kołpa; Zdzisław Wolak; Anna Różańska; Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jadwiga Wojkowska-Mach; Tomasz Bochenek; Brian Godman; Amanda Glassman; Amanj Kurdi; Andrzej Pilc; Anna Rozanska; Szymon Skoczyński; Marta Wałaszek Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Catharina Schoenfeld; Yves Libert; Heribert Sattel; Delphine Canivet; France Delevallez; Andreas Dinkel; Pascal O Berberat; Alexander Wuensch; Darius Razavi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 4.430