Literature DB >> 19012993

A review of model applications for structured soils: b) Pesticide transport.

John Maximilian Köhne1, Sigrid Köhne, Jirka Simůnek.   

Abstract

The past decade has seen considerable progress in the development of models simulating pesticide transport in structured soils subject to preferential flow (PF). Most PF pesticide transport models are based on the two-region concept and usually assume one (vertical) dimensional flow and transport. Stochastic parameter sets are sometimes used to account for the effects of spatial variability at the field scale. In the past decade, PF pesticide models were also coupled with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and groundwater flow models for application at the catchment and larger regional scales. A review of PF pesticide model applications reveals that the principal difficulty of their application is still the appropriate parameterization of PF and pesticide processes. Experimental solution strategies involve improving measurement techniques and experimental designs. Model strategies aim at enhancing process descriptions, studying parameter sensitivity, uncertainty, inverse parameter identification, model calibration, and effects of spatial variability, as well as generating model emulators and databases. Model comparison studies demonstrated that, after calibration, PF pesticide models clearly outperform chromatographic models for structured soils. Considering nonlinear and kinetic sorption reactions further enhanced the pesticide transport description. However, inverse techniques combined with typically available experimental data are often limited in their ability to simultaneously identify parameters for describing PF, sorption, degradation and other processes. On the other hand, the predictive capacity of uncalibrated PF pesticide models currently allows at best an approximate (order-of-magnitude) estimation of concentrations. Moreover, models should target the entire soil-plant-atmosphere system, including often neglected above-ground processes such as pesticide volatilization, interception, sorption to plant residues, root uptake, and losses by runoff. The conclusions compile progress, problems, and future research choices for modelling pesticide displacement in structured soils.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19012993     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  5 in total

1.  Some considerations on the use of simple box models of contaminant fate in soils.

Authors:  A Pistocchi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Mobility and sorption assessment of selected pesticides in alluvial aquifer.

Authors:  Nevena V Živančev; Srđan R Kovačević; Tanja T Radović; Marina M Radišić; Milan A Dimkić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Agricultural mulching and fungicides-impacts on fungal biomass, mycotoxin occurrence, and soil organic matter decomposition.

Authors:  Maximilian Meyer; Dörte Diehl; Gabriele Ellen Schaumann; Katherine Muñoz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Coupled Effects of Pore Water Velocity and Soil Heterogeneity on Bacterial Transport: Intact vs. Repacked Soils.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Liqiong Yang; Xijuan Chen; Steven Ripp; Jie Zhuang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Visible-Near-Infrared Spectroscopy can predict Mass Transport of Dissolved Chemicals through Intact Soil.

Authors:  Sheela Katuwal; Maria Knadel; Per Moldrup; Trine Norgaard; Mogens H Greve; Lis W de Jonge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.