Literature DB >> 19012820

Long-term antipsychotic monotherapy for schizophrenia: disease burden and comparative outcomes for patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or haloperidol monotherapy in a pan-continental observational study.

Martin Dossenbach1, Jan Pecenak, Agata Szulc, Victoria Irimia, Martin Anders, Dusanka Logozar-Perkovic, Dalia Peciukaitiene, Moshe Kotler, Anatoly B Smulevich, Teena M West, Amanda J Lowry, Tamas Treuer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Noninterventional, naturalistic studies facilitate examination of current clinical practices and provide an understanding of the impact of the biopsychosocial aspects of schizophrenia. This article describes disease burden and patient outcomes, with an emphasis on the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of antipsychotic monotherapy.
METHOD: Outpatients initiating or changing antipsychotic therapy for DSM-IV- or ICD-10-defined schizophrenia (N = 7658) were allocated to olanzapine or nonolanzapine cohorts (November 2000 to December 2001). Treatment was at the psychiatrist's discretion, including flexible dosing and use of concomitant therapies and medications, with assessments at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Longitudinal clinical, pharmacologic, functional, and social data were collected over 36 months across 27 countries.
RESULTS: At entry, 76% of patients were initiated/switched to antipsychotic monotherapy, most commonly with olanzapine (N = 3222), risperidone (N = 1117), quetiapine (N = 189), or haloperidol (N = 257). Patients prescribed olanzapine were more likely to maintain their baseline monotherapy (p < .001) and did so for a longer period (p < .001) compared with other antipsychotics. Median time to discontinuation (in months) was as follows: olanzapine 30.0, risperidone 23.1, quetiapine 13.9, haloperidol 12.5. Olanzapine-treated patients were also more likely to respond, and did so more rapidly than patients on other monotherapies (p < .001). Response data were also favorable for risperidone; median time to response (in months) was as follows: olanzapine 5.2, risperidone 6.3, quetiapine 11.3, haloperidol 11.7. Treatment-emergent adverse events varied: olanzapine patients had less favorable odds for significant weight gain (p < .001); haloperidol patients, for motor dysfunction (p < or = .002).
CONCLUSION: These naturalistic data from less-studied outpatient communities highlight the variability in clinical and functional outcomes associated with long-term antipsychotic treatment. Copyright 2008 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19012820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of antipsychotic maintenance therapy with quetiapine in comparison with risperidone and olanzapine in routine schizophrenia treatment: results of a prospective observational trial.

Authors:  Reinhold Kilian; Tilman Steinert; Wiltrud Schepp; Prisca Weiser; Susanne Jaeger; Carmen Pfiffner; Karel Frasch; Gerhard W Eschweiler; Thomas Messer; Daniela Croissant; Thomas Becker; Gerhard Längle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Patients' preference for olanzapine orodispersible tablet compared with conventional oral tablet in a multinational, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Istvan Bitter; Tamás Treuer; Nesrin Dilbaz; Igor Oyffe; Eda M Ciorabai; Severiano L Gonzalez; Sandra Ruschel; Jolanta Salburg; Yulia Dyachkova
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Orally disintegrating olanzapine review: effectiveness, patient preference, adherence, and other properties.

Authors:  William Montgomery; Tamas Treuer; Jamie Karagianis; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Gavan Harrison
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Predictors of continuation with olanzapine during the 1-year naturalistic treatment of patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

Authors:  Wenyu Ye; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Yuka Tanji; Jennifer A Flynn; Michihiro Takahashi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  An in vitro analysis of disintegration times of different formulations of olanzapine orodispersible tablet: a preliminary report.

Authors:  David Hobbs; Jamie Karagianis; Tamas Treuer; Joel Raskin
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2013-12

6.  Remission, response, and relapse rates in patients with acute schizophrenia treated with olanzapine monotherapy or other atypical antipsychotic monotherapy: 12-month prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michihiro Takahashi; Naohiro Nakahara; Shinji Fujikoshi; Masaomi Iyo
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2015-07-14

7.  Randomized, double-blind, 6-week non-inferiority study of lurasidone and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Jianguo Shi; Lili Wang; Xia Zhang; Yunlong Tan; Jingyuan Zhao; Yuping Ning; Shiping Xie; Xuejun Liu; Qi Liu; Keqing Li; Xiaoliang Wang; Lehua Li; Xiufeng Xu; Wei Deng; Xiaoyan Luo; Gang Wang
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.188

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.