Literature DB >> 19012115

The interference of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impaired subjects.

Birgitta Larsby1, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell.   

Abstract

The objective of the investigation is to study the interference of different background noises on speech processing. For this purpose speech recognition with the Hagerman test and a test battery with speech comprehension tasks (SVIPS) were performed in speech-weighted background noises varying in temporal structure, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and meaningfulness. With different test criteria and a score of perceived effort, the aim was to get a more complete picture of speech comprehension under adverse listening situations. Twenty-four subjects, aged 56-83 years, with a bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment, participated in the study. Differences in performance between the different background noises varied depending on the speech processing task, SNR, and on quantitative versus qualitative outcome measures. Age effects were seen in the Hagerman test and especially in background conditions of modulated noises (speech and reversed speech). Findings are discussed in relation to a hypothesis suggesting that masking and distraction interference from background noises on speech processing at peripheral, central auditory, and cognitive levels depends on the SNR used and the noise type and the listening task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19012115     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802301159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of temporal structure in the investigation of sensory memory, auditory scene analysis, and speech perception: a healthy-aging perspective.

Authors:  Johanna Maria Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; David Poeppel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Impact of Aging and Cognition on Hearing Assistive Technology Use.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

4.  Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Heather Cones
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Effect of signal to noise ratio on the speech perception ability of older adults.

Authors:  Elahe Shojaei; Hassan Ashayeri; Zahra Jafari; Mohammad Reza Zarrin Dast; Koorosh Kamali
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-03-09

7.  Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation.

Authors:  Peter Molander; Peter Nordqvist; Marie Oberg; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; Gerhard Andersson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-25

9.  On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30

10.  Cognitive Processing Speed, Working Memory, and the Intelligibility of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Persons with Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Wycliffe Kabaywe Yumba
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.