OBJECTIVE: To describe the standardization process and reliability of anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurements. We examined both intra- and interobserver errors for skinfolds, circumferences and BIA. METHODS: For the intraobserver error assessment, first of all, 202 adolescents in the pilot study (110 boys, 92 girls, aged 13.64+/-0.78 years) were assessed. For the second intraobserver and interobserver assessments, 10 adolescents were studied (5 boys and 5 girls). RESULTS: The pilot study's intraobserver technical errors of measurement (TEMs) were between 0.12 and 2.9 mm for skinfold thicknesses, and between 0.13 and 1.75 cm for circumferences. Intraobserver reliability for skinfold thicknesses was greater than 69.44% and beyond 78.43% for circumferences. The final workshop's intraobserver TEMs for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences were smaller than 1; for BIA resistance TEMs were smaller than 0.1 Omega and for reactance they were smaller than 0.2 Omega. Intraobserver reliability values were greater than 95, 97, 99 and 97% for skinfold thicknesses, circumferences, BIA resistance and reactance, respectively. Interobserver TEMs for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences ranged from 1 to 2 mm; for BIA they were 1.16 and 1.26 Omega for resistance and reactance, respectively. Interobserver reliability for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences were greater than 90%, and for BIA resistance and reactance they were greater than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: After the results of the pilot study, it was necessary to optimize the quality of the anthropometric measurements before the final survey. Significant improvements were observed in the intraobserver reliabilities for all measurements, with interobserver reliabilities being higher than 90% for most of the measurements.The Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence Study aims to describe total body fat percentage and anthropometric indices of body fat distribution in European adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the standardization process and reliability of anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurements. We examined both intra- and interobserver errors for skinfolds, circumferences and BIA. METHODS: For the intraobserver error assessment, first of all, 202 adolescents in the pilot study (110 boys, 92 girls, aged 13.64+/-0.78 years) were assessed. For the second intraobserver and interobserver assessments, 10 adolescents were studied (5 boys and 5 girls). RESULTS: The pilot study's intraobserver technical errors of measurement (TEMs) were between 0.12 and 2.9 mm for skinfold thicknesses, and between 0.13 and 1.75 cm for circumferences. Intraobserver reliability for skinfold thicknesses was greater than 69.44% and beyond 78.43% for circumferences. The final workshop's intraobserver TEMs for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences were smaller than 1; for BIA resistance TEMs were smaller than 0.1 Omega and for reactance they were smaller than 0.2 Omega. Intraobserver reliability values were greater than 95, 97, 99 and 97% for skinfold thicknesses, circumferences, BIA resistance and reactance, respectively. Interobserver TEMs for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences ranged from 1 to 2 mm; for BIA they were 1.16 and 1.26 Omega for resistance and reactance, respectively. Interobserver reliability for skinfold thicknesses and circumferences were greater than 90%, and for BIA resistance and reactance they were greater than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: After the results of the pilot study, it was necessary to optimize the quality of the anthropometric measurements before the final survey. Significant improvements were observed in the intraobserver reliabilities for all measurements, with interobserver reliabilities being higher than 90% for most of the measurements.The Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence Study aims to describe total body fat percentage and anthropometric indices of body fat distribution in European adolescents.
Authors: Diego Moliner-Urdiales; Francisco B Ortega; Germán Vicente-Rodriguez; Juan P Rey-Lopez; Luis Gracia-Marco; Kurt Widhalm; Michael Sjöström; Luis A Moreno; Manuel J Castillo; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: I Iglesia; A M Santaliestra-Pasías; S Bel-Serrat; T Sadalla-Collese; M L Miguel-Berges; L A Moreno Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Pontus Henriksson; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Jérémy Vanhelst; Maria Forsner; Frederic Gottrand; Mathilde Kersting; Luis A Moreno; Jonatan R Ruiz; Kurt Widhalm; Francisco B Ortega Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Sergey Rudnev; Jane S Burns; Paige L Williams; Mary M Lee; Susan A Korrick; Tatiana Denisova; Yuri Dikov; Gennady Kozupitsa; Russ Hauser; Oleg Sergeyev Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Date: 2019-11-16
Authors: L Gracia-Marco; F B Ortega; D Jiménez-Pavón; G Rodríguez; M J Castillo; G Vicente-Rodríguez; L A Moreno Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Yi Lin; Inge Huybrechts; Carine Vereecken; Theodora Mouratidou; Jara Valtueña; Mathilde Kersting; Marcela González-Gross; Selin Bolca; Julia Wärnberg; Magdalena Cuenca-García; Frederic Gottrand; Elisabetta Toti; Sonia Gomez-Martínez; Evangelia Grammatikaki; Idoia Labayen; Luis A Moreno; Michael Sjöström; John Van Camp; Romana Roccaldo; Emma Patterson; Yannis Manios; Denes Molnar; Anthony Kafatos; Kurt Widhalm; Stefaan De Henauw Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2014-08-17 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: A M Santaliestra-Pasías; T Mouratidou; I Huybrechts; L Beghin; M Cuenca-García; M J Castillo; M Galfo; L Hallstrom; A Kafatos; Y Manios; A Marcos; D Molnar; M Plada; R Pedrero-Chamizo; K Widhalm; I De Bourdeaudhuij; L A Moreno Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez; Dominique Turck; Gerardo Rodríguez; Aline Meirhaeghe; Denes Molnár; Michael Sjöström; Manuel J Castillo; Frederic Gottrand; Luis A Moreno Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 17.152