Literature DB >> 19011208

Sensory coding of nest-site value in honeybee swarms.

Thomas D Seeley1, P Kirk Visscher.   

Abstract

This study investigates the first stage of the decision-making process of a honeybee swarm as it chooses a nest site: how a scout bee codes the value of a potential nest site in the waggle dances she produces to represent this site. We presented honeybee swarms with a two-alternative choice between a high-value site and a medium-value site and recorded the behavior of individually identifiable scout bees as they reported on these two alternatives. We found that bees performed equally lengthy inspections at the two sites, but that, on the swarm cluster, they performed more dance circuits per bee for the high-value site. We also found that there was much individual-level noise in the coding of site value, but that there were clear population-level differences in total dance circuits produced for the two sites. The first bee to find a site had a high probability of reporting the site with a waggle dance, regardless of its value. This discoverer-should-dance phenomenon may help ensure that a swarm gives attention to all discovered sites. There was rapid decay in the dance response; the number of dance circuits produced by a bee after visiting a site decreased linearly over sequential visits, and eventually each bee ceased visiting her site. This decay, or ;leakage', in the accumulation of bees at a site improves a swarm's decision-making ability by helping a swarm avoid making fast-decision errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011208     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.021071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Stephen C Mack; Dorion B Liston; Lisa Bogush; Randolf Menzel; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Do small swarms have an advantage when house hunting? The effect of swarm size on nest-site selection by Apis mellifera.

Authors:  T M Schaerf; J C Makinson; M R Myerscough; M Beekman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Frequency modulation of a bacterial quorum sensing response.

Authors:  Simon van Vliet; Bartosz Turkowyd; Vera Bettenworth; Annika Bamberger; Heiko Wendt; Matthew McIntosh; Wieland Steinchen; Ulrike Endesfelder; Anke Becker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  O Petit; J Gautrais; J-B Leca; G Theraulaz; J-L Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Different bees, different needs: how nest-site requirements have shaped the decision-making processes in homeless honeybees (Apis spp.).

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Conditional use of social and private information guides house-hunting ants.

Authors:  Adam L Cronin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A simple threshold rule is sufficient to explain sophisticated collective decision-making.

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Nigel R Franks; Samuel Ellis; Saki Okuda; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Response threshold variance as a basis of collective rationality.

Authors:  Tatsuhiro Yamamoto; Eisuke Hasegawa
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.