Literature DB >> 19010648

Analysis of prey capture and food transport kinematics in two Asian box turtles, Cuora amboinensis and Cuora flavomarginata (Chelonia, Geoemydidae), with emphasis on terrestrial feeding patterns.

Nikolay Natchev1, Egon Heiss, Patrick Lemell, Daniel Stratev, Josef Weisgram.   

Abstract

This study examines the kinematics and morphology of the feeding apparatus of two geoemydid chelonians, the Malayan (Amboina) box turtle (Cuora amboinensis) and the yellow-margined box turtle (Cuora flavomarginata). Both species are able to feed on land as well as in water. Feeding patterns were analysed by high-speed cinematography. The main focus of the present study is on the terrestrial feeding strategies in both Asian box turtles, because feeding on land has probably evolved de novo within the ancestrally aquatic genus Cuora. During terrestrial feeding (analysed for both species), the initial food prehension is always done by the jaws, whereas intraoral food transport and pharyngeal packing actions are tongue-based. The food uptake modes in Cuoras differ considerably from those described for purely terrestrial turtles. Lingual food prehension is typical of all tortoises (Testudinidae), but is absent in C. amboinensis and C. flavomarginata. A previous study on Terrapene carolina shows that this emydid turtle protrudes the tongue during ingestion on land, but that the first contact with the food item occurs by the jaws. Both Asian box turtles investigated here have highly movable, fleshy tongues; nonetheless, the hyolingual complex remains permanently retracted during initial prey capture. In aquatic feeding (analysed for C. amboinensis only), the prey is captured by a fast forward strike of the head (ram feeding). As opposed to ingestion on land, in the underwater grasp the hyoid protracts prior to jaw opening. The head morphology of the investigated species differs. In contrast to the Malayan box turtle, C. flavomarginata exhibits a more complexly structured dorsal lingual epithelium, a considerable palatal vault, weaker jaw adductor muscles and a simplified trochlear complex. The differences in the hyolingual morphology reflect the kinematic patterns of the terrestrial feeding transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19010648     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent insights into the morphological diversity in the amniote primary and secondary palates.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Joy Marion Richman
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  The oropharyngeal morphology in the semiaquatic giant Asian pond turtle, Heosemys grandis, and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Monika Lintner; Anton Weissenbacher; Egon Heiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Flexibility is everything: prey capture throughout the seasonal habitat switches in the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris.

Authors:  Egon Heiss; Peter Aerts; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  Org Divers Evol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.940

4.  A new pelomedusoid turtle, Sahonachelys mailakavava, from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar provides evidence for convergent evolution of specialized suction feeding among pleurodires.

Authors:  Walter G Joyce; Yann Rollot; Serjoscha W Evers; Tyler R Lyson; Lydia J Rahantarisoa; David W Krause
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Feeding behaviour in a 'basal' tortoise provides insights on the transitional feeding mode at the dawn of modern land turtle evolution.

Authors:  Nikolay Natchev; Nikolay Tzankov; Ingmar Werneburg; Egon Heiss
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.