OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the clinical significance of hepatic parenchymal metastasis on survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of ovarian cancer patients with stages IIIc and IV hepatic parenchymal metastasis who were treated at the National Cancer Center in Korea between January 2001 and January 2008. Hepatic metastases were divided into unresectable, hematogenous parenchymal metastasis and resectable, parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were identified, 113 of whom were included in the study. The stage IIIc group included 97 patients, and the group with stage IV disease and hepatic parenchymal metastasis included 16 patients. Of the 16 patients with hepatic parenchymal metastasis, 2 patients had unresectable, hematogenous parenchymal metastasis with a poor prognosis compared to the patients with resectable, hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. Fourteen patients with hepatic parenchymal metastases from peritoneal seeding underwent complete resection without complications as follows: wedge resection (n=7), segmentectomy (n=5), and hemi-hepatectomy (n=2). Age, tumor grade, histology, serum CA-125 level, and the rate of optimal debulking were similar in patients with stage IIIc disease and patients with stage IV disease who had resectable, hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. The 5-year progression free survival rate and the 5-year overall survival rate for patients with stage IIIc disease and patients with stage IV disease and hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding were 25 and 23% (p=0.8063), and 55 and 51% (p=0.5671), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that complete hepatic resection should be attempted for patients with hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the clinical significance of hepatic parenchymal metastasis on survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of ovarian cancerpatients with stages IIIc and IV hepatic parenchymal metastasis who were treated at the National Cancer Center in Korea between January 2001 and January 2008. Hepatic metastases were divided into unresectable, hematogenous parenchymal metastasis and resectable, parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were identified, 113 of whom were included in the study. The stage IIIc group included 97 patients, and the group with stage IV disease and hepatic parenchymal metastasis included 16 patients. Of the 16 patients with hepatic parenchymal metastasis, 2 patients had unresectable, hematogenous parenchymal metastasis with a poor prognosis compared to the patients with resectable, hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. Fourteen patients with hepatic parenchymal metastases from peritoneal seeding underwent complete resection without complications as follows: wedge resection (n=7), segmentectomy (n=5), and hemi-hepatectomy (n=2). Age, tumor grade, histology, serum CA-125 level, and the rate of optimal debulking were similar in patients with stage IIIc disease and patients with stage IV disease who had resectable, hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding. The 5-year progression free survival rate and the 5-year overall survival rate for patients with stage IIIc disease and patients with stage IV disease and hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding were 25 and 23% (p=0.8063), and 55 and 51% (p=0.5671), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that complete hepatic resection should be attempted for patients with hepatic parenchymal metastasis from peritoneal seeding.
Authors: Samdeep K Mouli; Ramona Gupta; Neil Sheth; Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Sunila Pradeep; Seung W Kim; Sherry Y Wu; Masato Nishimura; Pradeep Chaluvally-Raghavan; Takahito Miyake; Chad V Pecot; Sun-Jin Kim; Hyun Jin Choi; Farideh Z Bischoff; Julie Ann Mayer; Li Huang; Alpa M Nick; Carolyn S Hall; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Behrouz Zand; Heather J Dalton; Thiruvengadam Arumugam; Ho Jeong Lee; Hee Dong Han; Min Soon Cho; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Lingegowda S Mangala; Vasudha Sehgal; Sang Cheul Oh; Jinsong Liu; Ju-Seog Lee; Robert L Coleman; Prahlad Ram; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Isaiah J Fidler; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Sarah I Kamel; Mechteld C de Jong; Richard D Schulick; Teresa P Diaz-Montes; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Barish H Edil; Michael A Choti; Robert A Anders; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Tsz-Lun Yeung; Cecilia S Leung; Kay-Pong Yip; Chi Lam Au Yeung; Stephen T C Wong; Samuel C Mok Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Maria Luisa Gasparri; Giovanni Grandi; Daniele Bolla; Beat Gloor; Sara Imboden; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Michael D Mueller; Andrea Papadia Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.553