Literature DB >> 19010465

Comparison between artificial neural network and multilinear regression models in an evaluation of cognitive workload in a flight simulator.

Manne Hannula1, Kerttu Huttunen, Jukka Koskelo, Tomi Laitinen, Tuomo Leino.   

Abstract

In this study, the performances of artificial neural network (ANN) analysis and multilinear regression (MLR) model-based estimation of heart rate were compared in an evaluation of individual cognitive workload. The data comprised electrocardiography (ECG) measurements and an evaluation of cognitive load that induces psychophysiological stress (PPS), collected from 14 interceptor fighter pilots during complex simulated F/A-18 Hornet air battles. In our data, the mean absolute error of the ANN estimate was 11.4 as a visual analog scale score, being 13-23% better than the mean absolute error of the MLR model in the estimation of cognitive workload.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19010465     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  2 in total

1.  Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Herng-Chia Chiu; Te-Wei Ho; King-Teh Lee; Hong-Yaw Chen; Wen-Hsien Ho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-04-30

2.  Assessment of ECG and respiration recordings from simulated emergency landings of ultra light aircraft.

Authors:  Ondřej Bruna; Tomáš Levora; Jan Holub
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.