OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate how fuzzy cognitive maps may be used to extract, present and compare Aboriginal perspectives, using the determinants of diabetes as a case study. METHODS: Participants from the Mohawk Community of Akwesasne and the Miawpukek First Nation in Conne River created fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) (N=3) detailing their views of "the causes of diabetes in their community", through a facilitated, group mapping session. For each FCM, the net causal effect of every determinant (direct or indirect) on diabetes was calculated from its transitive closure. The net causal effects were then compared across the set of FCMs to identify strong, weak and controversial determinants. RESULTS: Comparison of FCMs revealed significant heterogeneity in the perspectives of diabetes. The Akwesasne participants focused heavily on social, traditional and spiritual factors, while Conne River participants placed more importance on direct personal and lifestyle factors. There was, however, a core of strong, validated determinants related primarily to healthy diet and physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates how FCM may be used to extract and represent different perspectives of complex issues allowing for comparisons among stakeholders or knowledge groups. Comparison of multiple FCM employing the transitive closure may then be used to identify areas of agreement and controversy.
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate how fuzzy cognitive maps may be used to extract, present and compare Aboriginal perspectives, using the determinants of diabetes as a case study. METHODS:Participants from the Mohawk Community of Akwesasne and the Miawpukek First Nation in Conne River created fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) (N=3) detailing their views of "the causes of diabetes in their community", through a facilitated, group mapping session. For each FCM, the net causal effect of every determinant (direct or indirect) on diabetes was calculated from its transitive closure. The net causal effects were then compared across the set of FCMs to identify strong, weak and controversial determinants. RESULTS: Comparison of FCMs revealed significant heterogeneity in the perspectives of diabetes. The Akwesasne participants focused heavily on social, traditional and spiritual factors, while Conne River participants placed more importance on direct personal and lifestyle factors. There was, however, a core of strong, validated determinants related primarily to healthy diet and physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates how FCM may be used to extract and represent different perspectives of complex issues allowing for comparisons among stakeholders or knowledge groups. Comparison of multiple FCM employing the transitive closure may then be used to identify areas of agreement and controversy.
Authors: P Boston; S Jordan; E MacNamara; K Kozolanka; E Bobbish-Rondeau; H Iserhoff; S Mianscum; R Mianscum-Trapper; I Mistacheesick; B Petawabano; M Sheshamush-Masty; R Wapachee; J Weapenicappo Journal: Chronic Dis Can Date: 1997
Authors: Anna Dion; Alessandro Carini-Gutierrez; Vania Jimenez; Amal Ben Ameur; Emilie Robert; Lawrence Joseph; Neil Andersson Journal: J Mix Methods Res Date: 2021-10-13
Authors: Neil Andersson; Mario Beauchamp; Elizabeth Nava-Aguilera; Sergio Paredes-Solís; Mateja Šajna Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anne Cockcroft; Nobantu Marokoane; Leagajang Kgakole; Joseph Kefas; Neil Andersson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 2.655