Literature DB >> 19009483

Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions.

T O Hirche1, A Ignee, A P Barreiros, D Schreiber-Dietrich, S Jungblut, M Ott, H Hirche, C F Dietrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic-ultrasound-guided elastography (EUS-elastography) is a recently introduced imaging procedure that distinguishes tissues on the basis of their specific consistency. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the role of this new technique in the characterization and differentiation of focal pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 70 patients with unclassified solid lesions of the pancreas and 10 controls with a healthy pancreas. In all patients elastography recordings were compared with cytology/histology findings as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Adequate EUS-elastography of the pancreas was performed in all healthy controls but in only 56 % of patients with solid pancreatic lesions. The main limitation of elastographic image acquisition was incomplete delineation of the border of lesions greater than 35 mm in diameter (39 %) or of lesions at some distance from the transducer (10 %). Elastographic recordings were also hampered by the fact that the surrounding tissue, which is used as an internal reference standard for strain calculation, was insufficiently displayed in the case of larger lesions. The reduced ratio of target to surrounding tissue resulted in the formation of color artifacts and in impaired reproducibility. In contrast, the majority of lesions smaller than 35 mm in diameter were adequately and reproducibly evaluated by EUS-elastography (91 %). The clinical use for differential diagnosis, however, seems limited, since strain images from all kinds of pancreatic masses were found to be harder than the surrounding tissues, irrespective of the underlying nature of the lesion (i. e., malignant vs. benign). EUS-elastography predicted the nature of pancreatic lesions with poor diagnostic sensitivity (41 %), specificity (53 %), and accuracy (45 %).
CONCLUSION: EUS-elastography of the pancreas has the potential to obtain some complementary information that would improve tissue characterization. Its clinical utility, however, remains questionable, and it seems unlikely that the information provided will obviate the necessity of obtaining tissue samples for confirmation of a final pathologic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19009483     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  43 in total

1.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From the Origins to Routine EUS.

Authors:  Eugene P DiMagno; Matthew J DiMagno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  State-of-the-art imaging techniques in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Adrian Săftoiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Head mass in chronic pancreatitis: Inflammatory or malignant.

Authors:  Amit K Dutta; Ashok Chacko
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 5.  Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Ofelia Mosteanu; Radu Seicean
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS elastography.

Authors:  Takamichi Kuwahara; Yoshiki Hirooka; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Takuya Ishikawa; Manabu Kawai; Hiroki Suhara; Tomoaki Takeyama; Kiyotaka Hashizume; Toshinari Koya; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Daisuke Sakai; Takeshi Yamamura; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Kohei Funasaka; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Osamu Watanabe; Masatoshi Ishigami; Senju Hashimoto; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?

Authors:  Zeid Karadsheh; Mohammad Al-Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: contrast-enhanced harmonic (CEH-EUS), quantitative-elastography (QE-EUS), or both?

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Björn Lindkvist; Jose Lariño-Noia; Ihab Abdulkader-Nallib; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 10.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: pancreas.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Takamichi Kuwahara; Atsushi Irisawa; Fumihide Itokawa; Hiroki Uchida; Naoki Sasahira; Natsuko Kawada; Yuya Itoh; Tsuyoshi Shiina
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.