| Literature DB >> 19009145 |
Eugênio Santana Franco1, Silvia Bomfim Hyppólito, Rosana Gomes de Freitas Menezes Franco, Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá, Paulo César de Almeida, Lorita Marlena Freitag Pagliuca, Nelson Fernando Pacheco da Rocha.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate the scoring criteria for digital cervicography. The study enrolled 300 women submitted to a clinical protocol using cytological examination alone, digital cervicography without image magnification (Evaluation 1), and digital cervicography plus additional image magnification and considering the positive criteria (Evaluation 2). Women's mean age was 27.6 years. Positive criteria for digital cervicography were identified in 111 positive cases with pre-cancerous cervical lesions (100%) and in 8 cases classified as false positives (2.6%). Evaluations 1 and 2 classified the tests as positive (163; 54.3%) and suspected (146; 48.6%), respectively. According to the findings, digital cervicography was more sensitive (99.1%) and cytology more specific (100%). Digital cervicography sensitivity increased by 4.5 times when the positive criteria were applied as compared to cytology alone, besides involving low cost, thus suggesting that it is a viable technique.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19009145 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008001100020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cad Saude Publica ISSN: 0102-311X Impact factor: 1.632